From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
To: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Cc: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, avi@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/2] block: Write out internal caches even with cache=unsafe
Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2011 09:53:07 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4EA51963.5060904@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4EA515B9.8070204@redhat.com>
On 10/24/2011 09:37 AM, Kevin Wolf wrote:
>> Why? cache=unsafe is explicitly allowing to s/data/manure/ on
>> crash.
>
> It's surely expected on a host crash, but is it for a qemu crash?
> cache=unsafe was introduced to avoid fsync() costs, which it still
> does after this patch.
I think it's not about "why is it there", but rather about "what is it
useful for". My interpretation of it is "I do not need the image
anymore unless the command exits cleanly": VM installations, qemu-img
conversions, BDRV_O_SNAPSHOT (doesn't do it yet, but it could). Even
SIGINT and SIGTERM would be excluded from this definition, but they cost
nothing so it's nice to include them.
>> If you do this for raw-posix, you need to do it for all protocols.
>
> rbd could use it, too, right. Any other protocol I missed?
NBD could, but it doesn't support flush yet.
In general, even if it were useful to implement this, I'm not sure this
is the best way to implement it. For example you could simply clear
BDRV_O_NO_FLUSH in qcow2_open.
Paolo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-10-24 7:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-10-21 17:08 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/2] block: Write out internal caches even with cache=unsafe Kevin Wolf
2011-10-21 17:08 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/2] raw-posix: Convert to bdrv_co_flush Kevin Wolf
2011-10-21 17:08 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/2] block: Handle cache=unsafe only in raw-posix/win32 Kevin Wolf
2011-10-21 18:44 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/2] block: Write out internal caches even with cache=unsafe Paolo Bonzini
2011-10-22 15:07 ` Alexander Graf
2011-10-23 14:33 ` Paolo Bonzini
2011-10-24 8:05 ` Kevin Wolf
2011-10-24 7:37 ` Kevin Wolf
2011-10-24 7:53 ` Paolo Bonzini [this message]
2011-10-24 8:17 ` Kevin Wolf
2011-10-24 8:47 ` Paolo Bonzini
2011-10-24 8:54 ` Kevin Wolf
2011-10-24 9:26 ` Paolo Bonzini
2011-10-24 9:36 ` Kevin Wolf
2011-10-24 9:40 ` Paolo Bonzini
2011-10-24 9:53 ` Kevin Wolf
2011-10-24 10:08 ` Paolo Bonzini
2011-10-24 9:09 ` Peter Maydell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4EA51963.5060904@redhat.com \
--to=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=agraf@suse.de \
--cc=avi@redhat.com \
--cc=kwolf@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).