From: Dor Laor <dlaor@redhat.com>
To: Anthony Liguori <anthony@codemonkey.ws>
Cc: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] KVM call agenda for October 25
Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2011 15:18:40 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4EA6B730.3040609@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4EA6B41B.3000903@codemonkey.ws>
On 10/25/2011 03:05 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> On 10/25/2011 07:35 AM, Kevin Wolf wrote:
>> Am 24.10.2011 13:35, schrieb Paolo Bonzini:
>>> On 10/24/2011 01:04 PM, Juan Quintela wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi
>>>>
>>>> Please send in any agenda items you are interested in covering.
>>>
>>> - What's left to merge for 1.0.
>>
>> I would still like to cache the default cache mode (probably to
>> cache=writeback). We don't allow guests to toggle WCE yet which Anthony
>> would have liked to see before doing the change. Is it a strict
>> requirement?
>
> I don't see a way around it. If the default mode is cache=writeback,
> then we're open to data corruption in any guest where barrier=0. With
> guest togglable WCE, it ends up being a guest configuration issue so we
> can more or less defer responsibility.
>
> Do you think it's a good idea to change the default mode w/o guest WCE
> toggle support? What's your view about older guests if we change the
> default mode? What's your main motivation for wanting to change the
> default mode?
>
> I'd be much more open to changing the default mode to cache=none FWIW
> since the risk of data loss there is much, much lower.
A bit related to this, it would be nice to mark a VM un-migratable if
cache!=none. Juan reports that currently it such VMs are exposed to data
integrity issues so we need to fail migrating them automatically.
>
> Regards,
>
> Anthony Liguori
>
>>
>> Kevin
>>
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-10-25 13:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-10-24 11:04 [Qemu-devel] KVM call agenda for October 25 Juan Quintela
2011-10-24 11:35 ` Paolo Bonzini
2011-10-24 12:02 ` Peter Maydell
2011-10-24 13:06 ` Andreas Färber
2011-10-24 15:34 ` Luiz Capitulino
2011-10-25 12:35 ` Kevin Wolf
2011-10-25 13:05 ` Anthony Liguori
2011-10-25 13:18 ` Dor Laor [this message]
2011-10-25 13:28 ` Anthony Liguori
2011-10-25 13:40 ` Andreas Färber
2011-10-25 13:56 ` Kevin Wolf
2011-10-25 14:06 ` Anthony Liguori
2011-10-25 15:32 ` Kevin Wolf
2011-10-25 22:19 ` Alexander Graf
2011-10-26 20:41 ` Anthony Liguori
2011-10-26 8:15 ` Kevin Wolf
2011-10-26 8:48 ` Markus Armbruster
2011-10-26 9:41 ` Paolo Bonzini
2011-10-26 11:12 ` Markus Armbruster
2011-10-26 9:57 ` Daniel P. Berrange
2011-10-26 11:23 ` Kevin Wolf
2011-10-26 11:39 ` Daniel P. Berrange
2011-10-26 12:18 ` Kevin Wolf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4EA6B730.3040609@redhat.com \
--to=dlaor@redhat.com \
--cc=anthony@codemonkey.ws \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kwolf@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).