From: Bob Breuer <breuerr@mc.net>
To: Kai Tietz <ktietz70@googlemail.com>
Cc: "gcc@gcc.gnu.org" <gcc@gcc.gnu.org>,
xunxun <xunxun1982@gmail.com>, qemu-devel <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>,
Mark Cave-Ayland <mark.cave-ayland@siriusit.co.uk>,
Richard Henderson <rth@twiddle.net>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] gcc auto-omit-frame-pointer vs msvc longjmp
Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2011 10:14:48 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4EA6D268.50509@mc.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAEwic4bUxi6io6wRWvSGwqs98STh0vrMPDWb9Ay97i-ME+XeyA@mail.gmail.com>
Kai Tietz wrote:
> 2011/10/24 Bob Breuer <breuerr@mc.net>:
>> Kai Tietz wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> For trunk-version I have a tentative patch for this issue. On 4.6.x
>>> and older branches this doesn't work, as here we can't differenciate
>>> that easy between ms- and sysv-abi.
>>>
>>> But could somebody give this patch a try?
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Kai
>>>
>>> ChangeLog
>>>
>>> * config/i386/i386.c (ix86_frame_pointer_required): Enforce use of
>>> frame-pointer for 32-bit ms-abi, if setjmp is used.
>>>
>>> Index: i386.c
>>> ===================================================================
>>> --- i386.c (revision 180099)
>>> +++ i386.c (working copy)
>>> @@ -8391,6 +8391,10 @@
>>> if (SUBTARGET_FRAME_POINTER_REQUIRED)
>>> return true;
>>>
>>> + /* For older 32-bit runtimes setjmp requires valid frame-pointer. */
>>> + if (TARGET_32BIT_MS_ABI && cfun->calls_setjmp)
>>> + return true;
>>> +
>>> /* In ix86_option_override_internal, TARGET_OMIT_LEAF_FRAME_POINTER
>>> turns off the frame pointer by default. Turn it back on now if
>>> we've not got a leaf function. */
>>>
>> For a gcc 4.7 snapshot, this does fix the longjmp problem that I
>> encountered. So aside from specifying -fno-omit-frame-pointer for
>> affected files, what can be done for 4.6?
>>
>> Bob
>
> Well, for 4.6.x (or older) we just can use the mingw32.h header in
> gcc/config/i386/ and define here a subtarget-macro to indicate that.
> The only incompatible point here might be for Wine using the
> linux-compiler to build Windows related code.
>
> A possible patch for 4.6 gcc versions I attached to this mail.
>
> Regards,
> Kai
>
> Index: mingw32.h
> ===================================================================
> --- mingw32.h (revision 180393)
> +++ mingw32.h (working copy)
> @@ -239,3 +239,8 @@
> /* We should find a way to not have to update this manually. */
> #define LIBGCJ_SONAME "libgcj" /*LIBGCC_EH_EXTN*/ "-12.dll"
>
> +/* For 32-bit Windows we need valid frame-pointer for function using
> + setjmp. */
> +#define SUBTARGET_SETJMP_NEED_FRAME_POINTER \
> + (!TARGET_64BIT && cfun->calls_setjmp)
> +
> Index: i386.c
> ===================================================================
> --- i386.c (revision 180393)
> +++ i386.c (working copy)
> @@ -8741,6 +8741,12 @@
> if (SUBTARGET_FRAME_POINTER_REQUIRED)
> return true;
>
> +#ifdef SUBTARGET_SETJMP_NEED_FRAME_POINTER
> + /* For older 32-bit runtimes setjmp requires valid frame-pointer. */
> + if (SUBTARGET_SETJMP_NEED_FRAME_POINTER)
> + return true;
> +#endif
> +
> /* In ix86_option_override_internal, TARGET_OMIT_LEAF_FRAME_POINTER
> turns off the frame pointer by default. Turn it back on now if
> we've not got a leaf function. */
>
That works for me. Thanks.
Bob
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-10-25 15:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-10-17 4:39 [Qemu-devel] qemu-system-sparc io-thread segfault on win32 Bob Breuer
[not found] ` <4E9C0497.2000605@siriusit.co.uk>
2011-10-17 14:09 ` Bob Breuer
2011-10-17 17:22 ` [Qemu-devel] gcc auto-omit-frame-pointer vs msvc longjmp Richard Henderson
2011-10-17 19:14 ` Blue Swirl
2011-10-17 20:11 ` Richard Henderson
2011-10-17 21:20 ` Bob Breuer
2011-10-17 21:31 ` Kai Tietz
2011-10-17 22:23 ` Bob Breuer
2011-10-17 22:56 ` Kai Tietz
2011-10-19 21:05 ` Bob Breuer
2011-10-19 22:19 ` Richard Henderson
2011-10-20 4:22 ` xunxun
2011-10-20 14:48 ` Kai Tietz
2011-10-20 15:34 ` Kai Tietz
[not found] ` <j7sgfi$i66$1@dough.gmane.org>
2011-10-22 5:13 ` xunxun
2011-10-22 5:21 ` xunxun
2011-10-22 11:19 ` Kai Tietz
2011-10-22 14:23 ` asmwarrior
2011-10-24 14:45 ` Bob Breuer
2011-10-24 16:18 ` Kai Tietz
2011-10-25 15:14 ` Bob Breuer [this message]
2011-10-20 13:04 ` jojelino
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4EA6D268.50509@mc.net \
--to=breuerr@mc.net \
--cc=gcc@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=ktietz70@googlemail.com \
--cc=mark.cave-ayland@siriusit.co.uk \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=rth@twiddle.net \
--cc=xunxun1982@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).