From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:53770)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <kwolf@redhat.com>) id 1RKmtc-0001tz-9h
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 31 Oct 2011 04:07:07 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <kwolf@redhat.com>) id 1RKmtb-0002eo-8E
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 31 Oct 2011 04:07:04 -0400
Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:33410)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <kwolf@redhat.com>) id 1RKmta-0002ea-UR
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 31 Oct 2011 04:07:03 -0400
Message-ID: <4EAE57DF.9080602@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2011 09:10:07 +0100
From: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <1320030109-20476-1-git-send-email-wuzhy@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
In-Reply-To: <1320030109-20476-1-git-send-email-wuzhy@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] qed: adjust the way to get nb_sectors
List-Id: <qemu-devel.nongnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/options/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Zhi Yong Wu <wuzhy@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, stefanha@linux.vnet.ibm.com

Am 31.10.2011 04:01, schrieb Zhi Yong Wu:
> It is better to use qiov.size in qed-table.c to get nb_sectors than iov.iov_len.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Zhi Yong Wu <wuzhy@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

The commit message should probably say why it's better. Not saying
otherwise, but I can't see the different at the first sight.

Kevin