From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:38489) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RLAAh-0006Af-1p for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 01 Nov 2011 04:58:15 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RLAAa-00082R-Ap for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 01 Nov 2011 04:58:14 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:40224) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RLAAa-00081t-1Z for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 01 Nov 2011 04:58:08 -0400 Message-ID: <4EAFB49A.2040004@redhat.com> Date: Tue, 01 Nov 2011 09:58:02 +0100 From: Gerd Hoffmann MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <4EAB0169.8090408@virtualcomputer.com> In-Reply-To: <4EAB0169.8090408@virtualcomputer.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/2] Allow 1366x768 as a valid VGA resolution List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: John Baboval Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org On 10/28/11 21:24, John Baboval wrote: > 760p TV panels have a 1366x768 resolution, and have been popular > recently as low-cost monitors. The 1366 resolution doesn't pass > the (xres & 7) == 0 test. Why is it save to simply remove the test? Guess there is a reason why it is there in the first place? cheers, Gerd