From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:38040) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RLJGQ-0007Xf-EQ for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 01 Nov 2011 14:40:47 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RLJGK-0003f2-J5 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 01 Nov 2011 14:40:46 -0400 Message-ID: <4EB03CDA.1030405@web.de> Date: Tue, 01 Nov 2011 19:39:22 +0100 From: =?ISO-8859-15?Q?Andreas_F=E4rber?= MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1320140389-22079-1-git-send-email-sunshine@sunshineco.com> In-Reply-To: <1320140389-22079-1-git-send-email-sunshine@sunshineco.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] qemu-barrier: Fix build failure on PowerPC Mac OS X List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Eric Sunshine Cc: qemu-trivial@nongnu.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, David Gibson Am 01.11.2011 10:39, schrieb Eric Sunshine: > qemu-barrier.h tests if macro __powerpc__ is defined, however, the > preprocessor on PowerPC Mac OS X defines only __POWERPC__, not > __powerpc__. > Resolve by testing instead for qemu-provided _ARCH_PPC. This part is actually wrong: _ARCH_PPC is compiler-provided. >=20 > Signed-off-by: Eric Sunshine I currently don't have access to my ppc64 box, so Reviewed-by: Andreas F=E4rber Next time please cc malc (TCG ppc) and me (Darwin) on this. Thanks, Andreas > --- >=20 > The anomalous __powerpc__ test appears only in qemu-barrier.h. > No other source files reference this name. >=20 > Cc: David Gibson >=20 > qemu-barrier.h | 2 +- > 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) >=20 > diff --git a/qemu-barrier.h b/qemu-barrier.h > index 735eea6..c11bb2b 100644 > --- a/qemu-barrier.h > +++ b/qemu-barrier.h > @@ -14,7 +14,7 @@ > */ > #define smp_wmb() barrier() > =20 > -#elif defined(__powerpc__) > +#elif defined(_ARCH_PPC) > =20 > /* > * We use an eieio() for a wmb() on powerpc. This assumes we don't