From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:42483) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RMxup-0006xF-Sj for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 06 Nov 2011 03:17:20 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RMxuo-0004oi-AY for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 06 Nov 2011 03:17:19 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:1025) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RMxun-0004oe-Vv for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 06 Nov 2011 03:17:18 -0500 Message-ID: <4EB64286.5060208@redhat.com> Date: Sun, 06 Nov 2011 09:17:10 +0100 From: Paolo Bonzini MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <97415193721205@192.168.2.69> <9741628972730@192.168.2.69> In-Reply-To: <9741628972730@192.168.2.69> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Do you have a use for a tester of virtio-scsi with CD drives ? List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Thomas Schmitt Cc: kwolf@redhat.com, stefanha@gmail.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org On 11/05/2011 09:47 PM, Thomas Schmitt wrote: > Since BD-R are very similar to DVD+R, but much more expensive, > i will tomorrow only test the case without RESERVE TRACK. Yeah, I don't think it's necessary. It would be more interesting if you tried again the failure cases with a virtio drive (if=virtio). It would appear as /dev/vda but you can issue SG_IO to it. This would isolate the failure to the kernels vs. the SCSI subsystem. Paolo