From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:45813) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RNQRT-0001lq-CZ for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 07 Nov 2011 09:45:00 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RNQRN-0007oa-FS for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 07 Nov 2011 09:44:55 -0500 Received: from mail-gy0-f173.google.com ([209.85.160.173]:45178) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RNQRN-0007oV-Bm for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 07 Nov 2011 09:44:49 -0500 Received: by gyb11 with SMTP id 11so4464440gyb.4 for ; Mon, 07 Nov 2011 06:44:48 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <4EB7EEDD.4090604@codemonkey.ws> Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2011 08:44:45 -0600 From: Anthony Liguori MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1320663634-29453-1-git-send-email-kraxel@redhat.com> <4EB7E896.9010108@redhat.com> <4EB7EC4A.90607@redhat.com> <4EB7EE62.7070805@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <4EB7EE62.7070805@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1.0] ac97: don't override the pci subsystem id List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Avi Kivity Cc: Takashi Iwai , Gerd Hoffmann , kvm@vger.kernel.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org On 11/07/2011 08:42 AM, Avi Kivity wrote: > On 11/07/2011 04:33 PM, Gerd Hoffmann wrote: >> On 11/07/11 15:17, Avi Kivity wrote: >>> On 11/07/2011 01:00 PM, Gerd Hoffmann wrote: >>>> This patch removes the code lines which set the subsystem id for the >>>> emulated ac97 card to 8086:0000. Due to the device id being zero the >>>> subsystem id isn't vaild anyway. With the patch applied the sound card >>>> gets the default qemu subsystem id (1af4:1100) instead. >>> >>> This a guest ABI change. Do we want -M support for it? >> >> Given that the old subsystem id isn't valid I'd say no unless someone >> comes up with a good reason. > > Do we know that Windows won't complain about it? I thought the original motivation for the default subsystem ids was that some Windows test suite was explicitly complaining about having invalid subsystem ids? Regards, Anthony Liguori >