From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:58852)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <avi@redhat.com>) id 1RQ0gs-00020V-Ru
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 14 Nov 2011 12:51:31 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <avi@redhat.com>) id 1RQ0gr-0004P2-S5
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 14 Nov 2011 12:51:30 -0500
Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:1769)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <avi@redhat.com>) id 1RQ0gr-0004Ot-Kk
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 14 Nov 2011 12:51:29 -0500
Message-ID: <4EC1551D.1020803@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2011 19:51:25 +0200
From: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <1321190871-22769-1-git-send-email-alevy@redhat.com>	<4EC0F039.9090507@redhat.com>	<20111114114401.GI7140@garlic.redhat.com>	<4EC13A03.8040601@redhat.com>
	<4EC13CDD.8080405@codemonkey.ws> <4EC153CE.3070406@redhat.com>
	<4EC1546E.3080004@codemonkey.ws>
In-Reply-To: <4EC1546E.3080004@codemonkey.ws>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC 1.0] pc_piix: set qxl revision to 2 for
	pc-0.14
List-Id: <qemu-devel.nongnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/options/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Anthony Liguori <anthony@codemonkey.ws>
Cc: "Justin >> \"Justin M. Forbes\"" <jmforbes@linuxtx.org>, Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@redhat.com>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org

On 11/14/2011 07:48 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> On 11/14/2011 11:45 AM, Avi Kivity wrote:
>> On 11/14/2011 06:07 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
>>>> Antony, can you apply this directly or do you wanna have a
>>>> single-patch-pull-request instead?
>>>
>>>
>>> Yes, I'll apply directly.
>>
>> Does stable-0.15 need it too?
>
> You mean to set the revision to 2 for 0.14, right?  Not to set the
> revision to 2 for 0.15?
>

I mean, change stable-0.15 so that if it is invoked with -M 0.14, you
get a rev 2 qxl device.

The Fedora 16 regression which triggered this was running 0.15, I
imagine (but it could be running virt-preview, or something, so not sure).

-- 
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function