From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:37953) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RR0OR-0003vy-1B for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 17 Nov 2011 06:44:35 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RR0ON-0002ny-R6 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 17 Nov 2011 06:44:34 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:65124) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RR0ON-0002nq-Ju for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 17 Nov 2011 06:44:31 -0500 Message-ID: <4EC4F392.2040803@redhat.com> Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2011 12:44:18 +0100 From: Paolo Bonzini MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1321282528-19070-1-git-send-email-peter.maydell@linaro.org> <4EC3C9B1.5050109@redhat.com> <4EC41574.5080606@codemonkey.ws> <1321528810.3137.446.camel@hornet.cambridge.arm.com> In-Reply-To: <1321528810.3137.446.camel@hornet.cambridge.arm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC 0/4] virtio-mmio transport List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Pawel Moll Cc: Peter Maydell , qemu-devel , "paul@codesourcery.com" On 11/17/2011 12:20 PM, Pawel Moll wrote: >> > Correct. Syborg virtio was something Paul Brook did bit is not an "official" >> > virtio transport as far as Linux or the spec is concerned. > Honestly, that's the first time I hear about it, and as I'm not allowed > to look at qemu code (legal reasons, just don't ask;-) it's hard for me > to comment. But during the discussions about virtio-mmio, no one > mentioned it at all! Is it similar in ideas? Yes. :) > I do apologise if I jeopardised somebody's work, but it wasn't on > purpose... No worries at all, I was more interested about code duplication in QEMU. But perhaps syborg_virtio could simply go away. Paolo