[Qemu-devel] KVM call agenda for November 29

[Qemu-devel] KVM call agenda for November 29

[Juan Quintela]

Hi

Please send in any agenda items you are interested in covering.

Thanks, Juan.

Re: [Qemu-devel] KVM call agenda for November 29

[Anthony Liguori]

On 11/28/2011 08:24 AM, Juan Quintela wrote:
>
> Hi
>
> Please send in any agenda items you are interested in covering.

- 1.1 development window logistics

Regards,

Anthony Liguori

>
> Thanks, Juan.
>

Re: [Qemu-devel] KVM call agenda for November 29

[Avi Kivity]

On 11/28/2011 04:28 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> On 11/28/2011 08:24 AM, Juan Quintela wrote:
>>
>> Hi
>>
>> Please send in any agenda items you are interested in covering.
>
> - 1.1 development window logistics

(somewhat related) memory API conversion queue merge plan

-- 
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function

Re: [Qemu-devel] KVM call agenda for November 29

[Anthony Liguori]

On 11/28/2011 08:30 AM, Avi Kivity wrote:
> On 11/28/2011 04:28 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
>> On 11/28/2011 08:24 AM, Juan Quintela wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi
>>>
>>> Please send in any agenda items you are interested in covering.
>>
>> - 1.1 development window logistics
>
> (somewhat related) memory API conversion queue merge plan

No need to wait until tomorrow to discuss it, I guess.

1.1 will open up on Friday.  I was going to make the suggestion that if anyone 
has more than 50 non-trivial patches queued in their trees (I suspect a few 
people do), they split up the pull requests into ~50 or so chunks and send them 
with a week or so spacing.

50 is just a random number.  Just split the requests into reasonable chunks so 
master doesn't totally fall apart all at once :-)

I think memory API may be a special case since a lot of the changes are trivial. 
  So I would expect a larger pull request for the memory API bits.

Regards,

Anthony Liguori

>

Re: [Qemu-devel] KVM call agenda for November 29

[Avi Kivity]

On 11/28/2011 04:35 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
>> (somewhat related) memory API conversion queue merge plan
>
>
> No need to wait until tomorrow to discuss it, I guess.
>
> 1.1 will open up on Friday.  I was going to make the suggestion that
> if anyone has more than 50 non-trivial patches queued in their trees
> (I suspect a few people do), they split up the pull requests into ~50
> or so chunks and send them with a week or so spacing.
>
> 50 is just a random number.  Just split the requests into reasonable
> chunks so master doesn't totally fall apart all at once :-)
>
> I think memory API may be a special case since a lot of the changes
> are trivial.  So I would expect a larger pull request for the memory
> API bits.

Yes, for the memory API conversion I'd like use 126 patch chunks.  While
there are probably a few regressions lurking in there, it's easily
bisectable and fixable.  Better in than out.

-- 
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function

Re: [Qemu-devel] KVM call agenda for November 29

[Juan Quintela]

Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com> wrote:
> On 11/28/2011 04:35 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
>>> (somewhat related) memory API conversion queue merge plan
>>
>>
>> No need to wait until tomorrow to discuss it, I guess.
>>
>> 1.1 will open up on Friday.  I was going to make the suggestion that
>> if anyone has more than 50 non-trivial patches queued in their trees
>> (I suspect a few people do), they split up the pull requests into ~50
>> or so chunks and send them with a week or so spacing.
>>
>> 50 is just a random number.  Just split the requests into reasonable
>> chunks so master doesn't totally fall apart all at once :-)
>>
>> I think memory API may be a special case since a lot of the changes
>> are trivial.  So I would expect a larger pull request for the memory
>> API bits.
>
> Yes, for the memory API conversion I'd like use 126 patch chunks.  While
> there are probably a few regressions lurking in there, it's easily
> bisectable and fixable.  Better in than out.

Bad boy, you should use 128 patchs chunks O:-)

I have the vmstate cpus conversion done, and for Friday would have
something about virtio conversion.

Later, Juan.

Re: [Qemu-devel] KVM call agenda for November 29

[Anthony Liguori]

On 11/28/2011 08:24 AM, Juan Quintela wrote:
>
> Hi
>
> Please send in any agenda items you are interested in covering.

Few more items:

  - sandboxing/embedding dynamic languages

Also a heads up about a couple series I've been waiting to send out for post 1.0:

  - QOM phase 1 (dynamic properties/stable paths)
  - Device model test frame work

Regards,

Anthony Liguori

>
> Thanks, Juan.
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html