From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:60708) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RVnAK-00049V-VT for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 30 Nov 2011 11:37:49 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RVnAJ-00022t-QD for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 30 Nov 2011 11:37:48 -0500 Received: from e31.co.us.ibm.com ([32.97.110.149]:45121) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RVnAJ-00022n-Jg for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 30 Nov 2011 11:37:47 -0500 Received: from /spool/local by e31.co.us.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Wed, 30 Nov 2011 09:37:44 -0700 Received: from d03av02.boulder.ibm.com (d03av02.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.195.168]) by d03relay04.boulder.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id pAUGageU055642 for ; Wed, 30 Nov 2011 09:36:45 -0700 Received: from d03av02.boulder.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d03av02.boulder.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.13.1/NCO v10.0 AVout) with ESMTP id pAUGagCS016636 for ; Wed, 30 Nov 2011 09:36:42 -0700 Message-ID: <4ED65B98.9080607@us.ibm.com> Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2011 10:36:40 -0600 From: Anthony Liguori MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <4ED63F5C.8000808@us.ibm.com> <20111130162947.GA26932@x200.localdomain> In-Reply-To: <20111130162947.GA26932@x200.localdomain> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] KVM Call Agenda for 12/6 (Tuesday) @ 10am US/Eastern List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Chris Wright Cc: "libvir-list@redhat.com" , "arch@ovirt.org" , qemu-devel , Juan Quintela On 11/30/2011 10:29 AM, Chris Wright wrote: > * Anthony Liguori (aliguori@us.ibm.com) wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I'd like to propose that we discuss guest agent convergence in our next KVM >> call. I've CC'd folks from oVirt and libvirt to join the discussion. >> >> I think we should probably attempt to have some structure to the discussion. >> I would suggest: >> >> 1. A short introduction to each of the guest agents, what guests they >> support, and what verbs they support. > > I think we did this once before w/ Matahari. Can we please capture > these things in email before the call, so people actually have time > to ponder the details. > >> 2. A short description of key requirements from each party (oVirt, libvirt, >> QEMU) for a guest agent > > Same here...call this the abstract/intro of the above detailed list of > verbs and guest support, and send it by Friday this week. > > I know there's plenty of details buried in the current thread and old > discussions of Matahari. But that's just it...buried... > >> 3. An open discussion about possible ways to collaborate/converge. > > That should really help facilitate this item ;) Good suggestions! Regards, Anthony Liguori > > thanks, > -chris >