From: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
To: Takuya Yoshikawa <yoshikawa.takuya@oss.ntt.co.jp>
Cc: KVM <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
quintela@redhat.com, Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org,
Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Takuya Yoshikawa <takuya.yoshikawa@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/4] KVM: Dirty logging optimization using rmap
Date: Thu, 01 Dec 2011 17:18:06 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4ED79AAE.8000201@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4ED5BC03.5000901@oss.ntt.co.jp>
On 11/30/2011 07:15 AM, Takuya Yoshikawa wrote:
> (2011/11/30 14:02), Takuya Yoshikawa wrote:
>
>> IIUC, even though O(1) is O(1) at the timing of GET DIRTY LOG, it
>> needs O(N) write
>> protections with respect to the total number of dirty pages:
>> distributed, but
>> actually each page fault, which should be logged, does some write
>> protection?
>
> Sorry, was not precise. It depends on the level, and not completely
> distributed.
> But I think it is O(N), and the total number of costs will not change
> so much,
> I guess.
That's true. But some applications do require low latency, and the
current code can impose a lot of time with the mmu spinlock held.
The total amount of work actually increases slightly, from O(N) to O(N
log N), but since the tree is so wide, the overhead is small.
--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-12-01 15:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20111114182041.43570cdf.yoshikawa.takuya@oss.ntt.co.jp>
[not found] ` <4EC0EC90.1090202@redhat.com>
[not found] ` <4EC0F3D3.9090907@oss.ntt.co.jp>
[not found] ` <4EC10BFE.7050704@redhat.com>
2011-11-16 8:17 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/4] KVM: Dirty logging optimization using rmap Takuya Yoshikawa
[not found] ` <4EC33C0B.1060807@oss.ntt.co.jp>
[not found] ` <4EC37D18.4010609@redhat.com>
[not found] ` <loom.20111129T104524-678@post.gmane.org>
[not found] ` <4ED4AF43.2040003@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
[not found] ` <4ED4B574.8090907@oss.ntt.co.jp>
[not found] ` <4ED4BFEB.5010600@redhat.com>
[not found] ` <4ED4C85A.5020509@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
[not found] ` <4ED4C9A3.50504@redhat.com>
[not found] ` <4ED4E626.5010507@redhat.com>
2011-11-30 5:02 ` Takuya Yoshikawa
2011-11-30 5:15 ` Takuya Yoshikawa
2011-12-01 15:18 ` Avi Kivity [this message]
2011-12-03 4:37 ` Takuya Yoshikawa
2011-12-04 10:20 ` Avi Kivity
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4ED79AAE.8000201@redhat.com \
--to=avi@redhat.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=quintela@redhat.com \
--cc=takuya.yoshikawa@gmail.com \
--cc=xiaoguangrong@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=yoshikawa.takuya@oss.ntt.co.jp \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).