From: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1.1 0/6] block: drop useless checks for NULL
Date: Mon, 05 Dec 2011 17:56:58 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4EDCF7DA.1050306@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1321289454-9219-1-git-send-email-pbonzini@redhat.com>
Am 14.11.2011 17:50, schrieb Paolo Bonzini:
> After the coroutinization of the block layer, immediate failures
> of an AIO operation will still return an AIOCB and only report
> failure with a bottom half. This lets us remove a lot of dead
> NULL checks (patches 1-5).
>
> Patch 6 is on a similar theme, but a bit different.
>
> Most "added" lines are actually just reindented.
>
> Paolo Bonzini (6):
> block: bdrv_aio_* do not return NULL
> block: simplify failure handling for bdrv_aio_multiwrite
> block: qemu_aio_get does not return NULL
> dma: the passed io_func does not return NULL
> block: dma_bdrv_* does not return NULL
> block: avoid useless checks on acb->bh
Thanks, applied all to the block branch.
Kevin
prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-12-05 16:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-11-14 16:50 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1.1 0/6] block: drop useless checks for NULL Paolo Bonzini
2011-11-14 16:50 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1.1 1/6] block: bdrv_aio_* do not return NULL Paolo Bonzini
2011-11-14 16:50 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1.1 2/6] block: simplify failure handling for bdrv_aio_multiwrite Paolo Bonzini
2011-11-14 16:50 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1.1 3/6] block: qemu_aio_get does not return NULL Paolo Bonzini
2011-11-14 16:50 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1.1 4/6] dma: the passed io_func " Paolo Bonzini
2011-11-14 16:50 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1.1 5/6] block: dma_bdrv_* " Paolo Bonzini
2011-11-14 16:50 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1.1 6/6] block: avoid useless checks on acb->bh Paolo Bonzini
2011-11-30 8:12 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1.1 v2] block: bdrv_aio_* do not return NULL Paolo Bonzini
2011-11-30 8:12 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1.1 0/6] block: drop useless checks for NULL Paolo Bonzini
2011-12-05 16:56 ` Kevin Wolf [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4EDCF7DA.1050306@redhat.com \
--to=kwolf@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).