From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:38010) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Ra5A6-0006rj-7n for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 12 Dec 2011 07:39:22 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Ra5A0-0001OO-BO for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 12 Dec 2011 07:39:18 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:15260) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Ra5A0-0001OG-4l for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 12 Dec 2011 07:39:12 -0500 Message-ID: <4EE5F5E9.2070504@redhat.com> Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2011 13:39:05 +0100 From: Gerd Hoffmann MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20111208174544.325838a6@doriath> <20111211102915.GB2791@garlic> <4EE5E59C.5030603@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Dropping the MONITOR_CMD_ASYNC List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Stefan Hajnoczi Cc: Yonit Halperin , qemu-devel , stefanha@linux.vnet.ibm.com, Luiz Capitulino On 12/12/11 13:10, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote: > On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 11:29 AM, Gerd Hoffmann wrote: >> On 12/12/11 11:18, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote: >>> On Sun, Dec 11, 2011 at 10:29 AM, Alon Levy wrote: >>>> On Thu, Dec 08, 2011 at 05:45:44PM -0200, Luiz Capitulino wrote: >>>>> Hi there, >>>>> >>>>> I'm about to completely drop the MONITOR_CMD_ASYNC API, but it turns out that >>>>> the command client_migrate_info uses it. That's a legacy interface and has to >>>>> be dropped, no command should be using it... >>>>> >>>>> Something tells me that if I just drop it (and change the command to use the >>>>> regular interface), bad things will happen. Am I right? :) >>>>> >>>> >>>> The monitor command client_migrate_info needs to complete after getting >>>> an ACK message from the currently connected spice client (this is the >>>> only case where this is required - if there is no client then the >>>> MONITOR_CMD_ASYNC API won't be used). This in turn requires the main >>>> thread to perform select and call the callback that will process this >>>> ACK. That's why the MONITOR_CMD_ASYNC API was used. >>>> >>>> I'm not aware of any other way to do this, I'll be glad for any help >>>> here. Also, I understand this is not what is not true async, since one >>>> would expect a true async interface to support multiple in flight >>>> monitor commands. If there is any ETA or existing way to do this we >>>> could change the implementation of client_migrate_info. >>> >>> Is it possible to use a QMP event to signal completion instead of a >>> MONITOR_CMD_ASYNC command? >> >> Problem is this breaks the qemu <-> libvirt interface. > > I had the same issue with the block_job_cancel command, which Adam > Litke and Eric Blake helped us fix and find a backward-compatible > libvirt solution for: > > http://www.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/2011-November/msg01351.html Isn't going to fly as waiting for completion isn't optional in that case. Workflow is this: (1) libvirt issues client_migrate_info command. (2) qemu forwards it to spice-server, which in turn forwards it to the spice client (if connected). (3) spice client connects to the migration target machine. (4) spice client signals completion to spice-server, which in turn notifies qemu. (5) qemu calls the monitor completion callback, libvirt gets client_migrate_info result. (6) libvirt issues migrate command. The problem is that (3) must be finished before (6) because qemu on the target side doesn't accept incoming tcp connections any more once the migration started. I don't see a way to switch this to qmp events without breaking old libvirt versions managing new qemu. cheers, Gerd