From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:58356) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RaTds-0007Qi-Qe for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 13 Dec 2011 09:47:41 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RaTdo-0006Yb-Kw for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 13 Dec 2011 09:47:40 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:3209) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RaTdo-0006YT-Bb for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 13 Dec 2011 09:47:36 -0500 Message-ID: <4EE76581.3080702@redhat.com> Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2011 16:47:29 +0200 From: Avi Kivity MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20111208174544.325838a6@doriath> <20111212155046.GB29447@garlic.tlv.redhat.com> <20111212140800.11873fa8@doriath> <4EE62B2F.4070408@codemonkey.ws> <4EE731B8.5000701@redhat.com> <4EE754F7.3030900@codemonkey.ws> In-Reply-To: <4EE754F7.3030900@codemonkey.ws> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Dropping the MONITOR_CMD_ASYNC List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Anthony Liguori Cc: kraxel@redhat.com, Alon Levy , qemu-devel , stefanha@linux.vnet.ibm.com, Luiz Capitulino On 12/13/2011 03:36 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote: > On 12/13/2011 05:06 AM, Avi Kivity wrote: >> On 12/12/2011 06:26 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote: >>> >>> Nope, it has to be dropped. >>> >>> Commands using CMD_ASYNC may fail in arbitrary ways because of the way >>> error reporting is done. This is an unfixable problem until we >>> eliminate all uses of qerror_report(). >>> >> >> Why don't we eliminate all uses for qerror_report() then? Breaking our >> interfaces instead seems like a horrible idea. > > That's what Luiz is doing right now. > So, the plan to drop MONITOR_CMD_ASYNC was dropped? -- error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function