From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:55830) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RarXZ-0002px-Ig for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 14 Dec 2011 11:18:47 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RarXY-0003hJ-5F for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 14 Dec 2011 11:18:45 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:1027) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RarXX-0003h8-Ny for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 14 Dec 2011 11:18:44 -0500 Message-ID: <4EE8CC59.4080100@redhat.com> Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2011 18:18:33 +0200 From: Avi Kivity MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20111214154735.7533.86725.malonedeb@chaenomeles.canonical.com> <20111214154735.7533.86725.malonedeb@chaenomeles.canonical.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [Bug 904308] [NEW] x86: BT/BTS/BTR/BTC: ZF flag is unaffected List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: malc Cc: Daniil Troshkov <904308@bugs.launchpad.net>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org On 12/14/2011 06:08 PM, malc wrote: > On Wed, 14 Dec 2011, Daniil Troshkov wrote: > > > Public bug reported: > > > > Hello! > > > > Bug was found in qemu.git. > > See target-i386/translate.c: > > > > [..snip..] > > Intel's documentation doesn't cover this, AMD's says that ZF is undefined, so, > question is: why do you think QEMU is wrong here? The Intel documentation states that ZF is unaffected. -- error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function