From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:41842) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RbBJX-0001Zm-B8 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 15 Dec 2011 08:25:39 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RbBJW-0003hJ-Bf for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 15 Dec 2011 08:25:35 -0500 Received: from mail-iy0-f173.google.com ([209.85.210.173]:39808) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RbBJW-0003hD-8c for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 15 Dec 2011 08:25:34 -0500 Received: by iagj37 with SMTP id j37so3204448iag.4 for ; Thu, 15 Dec 2011 05:25:33 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <4EE9F548.2080704@codemonkey.ws> Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2011 07:25:28 -0600 From: Anthony Liguori MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1323892874-13234-1-git-send-email-aliguori@us.ibm.com> <1323892874-13234-2-git-send-email-aliguori@us.ibm.com> <4EE9BDAE.6060200@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <4EE9BDAE.6060200@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 1/4] memory: make memory API parsable by gtkdoc-scan (v2) List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Kevin Wolf Cc: Peter Maydell , Avi Kivity , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Stefan Weil On 12/15/2011 03:28 AM, Kevin Wolf wrote: > Am 14.12.2011 21:01, schrieb Anthony Liguori: >> gtkdoc-scan cannot handle nested structs so remove those from the memory API. >> >> Signed-off-by: Anthony Liguori > > Surely the right thing to do then is fixing gtkdoc-scan? It's not quite that simple. gtkdoc uses a documentation format of: Thing Longer description of thing - sub-bullets about things parameters and/or members - another sub-bullet about things parameters and/or members. So it's expecting to deal with only one level of nesting. You would have to make significant changes to deal with multiple levels of nesting. That said, I think using an anonymous named structure for grouping is a bit dubious to begin with. Regards, Anthony Liguori > > Kevin >