From: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PULL 0/2] Plan obsolescense of exec.c memory functions
Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2011 16:22:58 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4EEA02C2.1060400@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4EEA0258.7090708@redhat.com>
On 12/15/2011 04:21 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>
>> cpu-common.h | 36 -----------------------------
>> exec-obsolete.h | 66
>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> exec.c | 3 ++
>> hw/etraxfs_eth.c | 3 --
>> memory.c | 3 ++
>> 5 files changed, 72 insertions(+), 39 deletions(-)
>> create mode 100644 exec-obsolete.h
>
>
> I would prefer exec-private.h or memory-private.h. Right now, the
> situation is that exec.c provides a low-level interface to memory.c.
> If the situation changes, the header will disappear.
Since the header is going to disappear, does it really matter? I plan
on removing it long before 1.1.
--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-12-15 14:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-12-15 13:35 [Qemu-devel] [PULL 0/2] Plan obsolescense of exec.c memory functions Avi Kivity
2011-12-15 13:35 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/2] etraxfs_eth: drop bogus cpu_unregister_io_memory() Avi Kivity
2011-12-15 13:35 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/2] memory: move obsolete exec.c functions to a private header Avi Kivity
2011-12-15 14:21 ` [Qemu-devel] [PULL 0/2] Plan obsolescense of exec.c memory functions Paolo Bonzini
2011-12-15 14:22 ` Avi Kivity [this message]
2011-12-15 14:26 ` Anthony Liguori
2011-12-19 15:01 ` Anthony Liguori
2011-12-19 15:06 ` Avi Kivity
2011-12-19 15:34 ` Avi Kivity
2011-12-19 16:15 ` Anthony Liguori
2011-12-19 17:12 ` Avi Kivity
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4EEA02C2.1060400@redhat.com \
--to=avi@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).