From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:49576) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RbCGQ-0005PT-03 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 15 Dec 2011 09:26:31 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RbCGL-0008W7-V0 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 15 Dec 2011 09:26:25 -0500 Received: from mail-iy0-f173.google.com ([209.85.210.173]:36649) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RbCGL-0008W2-Qj for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 15 Dec 2011 09:26:21 -0500 Received: by iagj37 with SMTP id j37so3279194iag.4 for ; Thu, 15 Dec 2011 06:26:21 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <4EEA0389.7070603@codemonkey.ws> Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2011 08:26:17 -0600 From: Anthony Liguori MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1323956131-471-1-git-send-email-avi@redhat.com> <4EEA0258.7090708@redhat.com> <4EEA02C2.1060400@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <4EEA02C2.1060400@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PULL 0/2] Plan obsolescense of exec.c memory functions List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Avi Kivity Cc: Paolo Bonzini , qemu-devel@nongnu.org On 12/15/2011 08:22 AM, Avi Kivity wrote: > On 12/15/2011 04:21 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote: >> >>> cpu-common.h | 36 ----------------------------- >>> exec-obsolete.h | 66 >>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >>> exec.c | 3 ++ >>> hw/etraxfs_eth.c | 3 -- >>> memory.c | 3 ++ >>> 5 files changed, 72 insertions(+), 39 deletions(-) >>> create mode 100644 exec-obsolete.h >> >> >> I would prefer exec-private.h or memory-private.h. Right now, the >> situation is that exec.c provides a low-level interface to memory.c. >> If the situation changes, the header will disappear. > > Since the header is going to disappear, does it really matter? I plan > on removing it long before 1.1. I don't think it does. Regards, Anthony Liguori >