From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:59171) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RbCkM-0007WK-9u for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 15 Dec 2011 09:57:23 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RbCkL-0006pi-2a for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 15 Dec 2011 09:57:22 -0500 Received: from mail-iy0-f173.google.com ([209.85.210.173]:33375) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RbCkK-0006pU-Qm for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 15 Dec 2011 09:57:21 -0500 Received: by iagj37 with SMTP id j37so3316737iag.4 for ; Thu, 15 Dec 2011 06:57:19 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <4EEA0ACA.9020309@codemonkey.ws> Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2011 08:57:14 -0600 From: Anthony Liguori MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20111215115731.3ee45e4b@doriath> <4EE9FEF1.4080709@codemonkey.ws> <20111215125203.698b2c07@doriath> In-Reply-To: <20111215125203.698b2c07@doriath> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Transitioning from HMP to QMP for QEMU List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Luiz Capitulino Cc: Kevin Wolf , Stefan Hajnoczi , qemu-devel , libvir-list@redhat.com, Adam Litke On 12/15/2011 08:52 AM, Luiz Capitulino wrote: > On Thu, 15 Dec 2011 08:06:41 -0600 > Anthony Liguori wrote: > >> There are still a lot of HMP commands that don't have an QMP analog. Luiz, it >> might make sense to setup a wiki page which instructions on how to convert an >> HMP command to a QMP command using QAPI. > > I wrote on how to write new QMP commands using the QAPI > (docs/writing-qmp-commands.txt), going from there to a conversion shouldn't > be difficult, but I can write a wiki page. > > Btw, counting with a series I haven't posted yet, we have less than 10 QMP > commands left to be converted to the QAPI. I expect to start working on HMP > conversions in January. That is awesome! Regards, Anthony Liguori > >> If we did that, we could probably get more folks involved in the conversion process. > > That would be wonderful. > >> >> Regards, >> >> Anthony Liguori >> >>> >>>> Does everyone agree on this? I think this is an important discussion >>>> if we want our management interface to get better and more consistent >>>> in the future. >>>> >>>> Stefan >>>> >>> >>> >> > >