From: Anthony Liguori <anthony@codemonkey.ws>
To: "Andreas Färber" <afaerber@suse.de>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Gleb Natapov <gleb@redhat.com>,
Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2] exec.c: Fix subpage memory access to RAM MemoryRegion
Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2011 12:09:26 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4EEA37D6.6080706@codemonkey.ws> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1322666781-6108-1-git-send-email-afaerber@suse.de>
On 11/30/2011 09:26 AM, Andreas Färber wrote:
> Commit 95c318f5e1f88d7e5bcc6deac17330fd4806a2d3 (Fix segfault in mmio
> subpage handling code.) prevented a segfault by making all subpage
> registrations over an existing memory page perform an unassigned access.
> Symptoms were writes not taking effect and reads returning zero.
>
> Very small page sizes are not currently supported either,
> so subpage memory areas cannot fully be avoided.
>
> Therefore change the previous fix to use a new IO_MEM_SUBPAGE_RAM
> instead of IO_MEM_UNASSIGNED. Suggested by Avi.
>
> Signed-off-by: Andreas Färber<afaerber@suse.de>
> Cc: Avi Kivity<avi@redhat.com>
> Cc: Gleb Natapov<gleb@redhat.com>
Applied. Thanks.
Regards,
Anthony Liguori
> ---
> cpu-common.h | 1 +
> exec.c | 65 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> 2 files changed, 64 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/cpu-common.h b/cpu-common.h
> index c9878ba..3f45428 100644
> --- a/cpu-common.h
> +++ b/cpu-common.h
> @@ -172,6 +172,7 @@ void cpu_physical_memory_write_rom(target_phys_addr_t addr,
> #define IO_MEM_ROM (1<< IO_MEM_SHIFT) /* hardcoded offset */
> #define IO_MEM_UNASSIGNED (2<< IO_MEM_SHIFT)
> #define IO_MEM_NOTDIRTY (3<< IO_MEM_SHIFT)
> +#define IO_MEM_SUBPAGE_RAM (4<< IO_MEM_SHIFT)
>
> /* Acts like a ROM when read and like a device when written. */
> #define IO_MEM_ROMD (1)
> diff --git a/exec.c b/exec.c
> index 6b92198..6c206ff 100644
> --- a/exec.c
> +++ b/exec.c
> @@ -3570,6 +3570,63 @@ static CPUWriteMemoryFunc * const subpage_write[] = {
> &subpage_writel,
> };
>
> +static uint32_t subpage_ram_readb(void *opaque, target_phys_addr_t addr)
> +{
> + ram_addr_t raddr = addr;
> + void *ptr = qemu_get_ram_ptr(raddr);
> + return ldub_p(ptr);
> +}
> +
> +static void subpage_ram_writeb(void *opaque, target_phys_addr_t addr,
> + uint32_t value)
> +{
> + ram_addr_t raddr = addr;
> + void *ptr = qemu_get_ram_ptr(raddr);
> + stb_p(ptr, value);
> +}
> +
> +static uint32_t subpage_ram_readw(void *opaque, target_phys_addr_t addr)
> +{
> + ram_addr_t raddr = addr;
> + void *ptr = qemu_get_ram_ptr(raddr);
> + return lduw_p(ptr);
> +}
> +
> +static void subpage_ram_writew(void *opaque, target_phys_addr_t addr,
> + uint32_t value)
> +{
> + ram_addr_t raddr = addr;
> + void *ptr = qemu_get_ram_ptr(raddr);
> + stw_p(ptr, value);
> +}
> +
> +static uint32_t subpage_ram_readl(void *opaque, target_phys_addr_t addr)
> +{
> + ram_addr_t raddr = addr;
> + void *ptr = qemu_get_ram_ptr(raddr);
> + return ldl_p(ptr);
> +}
> +
> +static void subpage_ram_writel(void *opaque, target_phys_addr_t addr,
> + uint32_t value)
> +{
> + ram_addr_t raddr = addr;
> + void *ptr = qemu_get_ram_ptr(raddr);
> + stl_p(ptr, value);
> +}
> +
> +static CPUReadMemoryFunc * const subpage_ram_read[] = {
> +&subpage_ram_readb,
> +&subpage_ram_readw,
> +&subpage_ram_readl,
> +};
> +
> +static CPUWriteMemoryFunc * const subpage_ram_write[] = {
> +&subpage_ram_writeb,
> +&subpage_ram_writew,
> +&subpage_ram_writel,
> +};
> +
> static int subpage_register (subpage_t *mmio, uint32_t start, uint32_t end,
> ram_addr_t memory, ram_addr_t region_offset)
> {
> @@ -3583,8 +3640,9 @@ static int subpage_register (subpage_t *mmio, uint32_t start, uint32_t end,
> printf("%s: %p start %08x end %08x idx %08x eidx %08x mem %ld\n", __func__,
> mmio, start, end, idx, eidx, memory);
> #endif
> - if ((memory& ~TARGET_PAGE_MASK) == IO_MEM_RAM)
> - memory = IO_MEM_UNASSIGNED;
> + if ((memory& ~TARGET_PAGE_MASK) == IO_MEM_RAM) {
> + memory = IO_MEM_SUBPAGE_RAM;
> + }
> memory = (memory>> IO_MEM_SHIFT)& (IO_MEM_NB_ENTRIES - 1);
> for (; idx<= eidx; idx++) {
> mmio->sub_io_index[idx] = memory;
> @@ -3817,6 +3875,9 @@ static void io_mem_init(void)
> cpu_register_io_memory_fixed(IO_MEM_NOTDIRTY, error_mem_read,
> notdirty_mem_write, NULL,
> DEVICE_NATIVE_ENDIAN);
> + cpu_register_io_memory_fixed(IO_MEM_SUBPAGE_RAM, subpage_ram_read,
> + subpage_ram_write, NULL,
> + DEVICE_NATIVE_ENDIAN);
> for (i=0; i<5; i++)
> io_mem_used[i] = 1;
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-12-15 18:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-11-30 15:26 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2] exec.c: Fix subpage memory access to RAM MemoryRegion Andreas Färber
2011-12-01 9:29 ` Avi Kivity
2011-12-01 9:37 ` Gleb Natapov
2011-12-01 9:41 ` Avi Kivity
2011-12-01 9:47 ` Gleb Natapov
2011-12-01 9:54 ` Avi Kivity
2011-12-01 10:06 ` Gleb Natapov
2011-12-01 17:18 ` Andreas Färber
2011-12-01 17:24 ` Avi Kivity
2011-12-09 12:32 ` Andreas Färber
2011-12-11 9:51 ` Avi Kivity
2011-12-15 18:09 ` Anthony Liguori [this message]
2012-08-22 16:53 ` Andreas Färber
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4EEA37D6.6080706@codemonkey.ws \
--to=anthony@codemonkey.ws \
--cc=afaerber@suse.de \
--cc=avi@redhat.com \
--cc=gleb@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).