From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:53014)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <kwolf@redhat.com>) id 1RbUG1-0004Ar-B2
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 16 Dec 2011 04:39:17 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <kwolf@redhat.com>) id 1RbUFx-0003Yz-Ae
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 16 Dec 2011 04:39:13 -0500
Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:27014)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <kwolf@redhat.com>) id 1RbUFx-0003Yv-2H
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 16 Dec 2011 04:39:09 -0500
Message-ID: <4EEB1277.4070803@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2011 10:42:15 +0100
From: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <1323721784-704-1-git-send-email-aliguori@us.ibm.com>
	<4EEA3813.80006@us.ibm.com>
In-Reply-To: <4EEA3813.80006@us.ibm.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 00/20] qom: dynamic properties and
 composition tree
List-Id: <qemu-devel.nongnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/options/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Anthony Liguori <aliguori@us.ibm.com>
Cc: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>, Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@linux.vnet.ibm.com>, Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Luiz Capitulino <lcapitulino@redhat.com>, Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>

Am 15.12.2011 19:10, schrieb Anthony Liguori:
> On 12/12/2011 02:29 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
>> This is a follow up to my previous series to get us started in the QOM
>> direction.  A few things are different this time around.  Most notably:
>>
>>   1) Devices no longer have names.  Instead, path names are always used to
>>      identify devices.
>>
>>   2) In order to support (1), dynamic properties are now supported.
>>
>>   3) The concept of a "root device" has been introduced.  The root device is
>>      roughly modelling the motherboard of a machine.  This type is a container
>>      type and it's best to think of it as something like a PCB board I guess.
>>
>> See my other mail for a description of my merge plan for QOM.
> 
> Applied.
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Anthony Liguori

So you pushed this with qdev_property_add_child() calls spread all over
the place instead of being treated like other properties? :-(

Kevin