From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:47082)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <anthony@codemonkey.ws>) id 1RbjFh-0007Zl-PX
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 16 Dec 2011 20:39:54 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <anthony@codemonkey.ws>) id 1RbjFg-0007Uj-OW
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 16 Dec 2011 20:39:53 -0500
Received: from mail-gy0-f173.google.com ([209.85.160.173]:62967)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <anthony@codemonkey.ws>) id 1RbjFg-0007UZ-M4
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 16 Dec 2011 20:39:52 -0500
Received: by ghbg19 with SMTP id g19so3279884ghb.4
	for <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>; Fri, 16 Dec 2011 17:39:51 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <4EEBF2E4.6000807@codemonkey.ws>
Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2011 19:39:48 -0600
From: Anthony Liguori <anthony@codemonkey.ws>
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20110930131148.GA4294@amd.home.annexia.org>	<20110930165152.GB4294@amd.home.annexia.org>	<20111216221956.GA23695@amd.home.annexia.org>
	<20111217000704.GB23695@amd.home.annexia.org>
In-Reply-To: <20111217000704.GB23695@amd.home.annexia.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] insmod virtio-blk is broken in qemu 1.0 (was: Re:
 git-bisect results
List-Id: <qemu-devel.nongnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/options/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: "Richard W.M. Jones" <rjones@redhat.com>
Cc: Max Filippov <jcmvbkbc@gmail.com>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@redhat.com>

On 12/16/2011 06:07 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>
> git bisect says this.  I didn't believe it first time, so I ran it
> twice with a few modifications, and it pointed to the same commit both
> times ...

Need more details because it doesn't appear to be broken to me.

What guest, what's your command line, what guest kernel version, how does it 
break, etc..

Regards,

Anthony Liguori

>
> 67882fd177389527510eb36b3f7712011a835545 is the first bad commit
> commit 67882fd177389527510eb36b3f7712011a835545
> Author: Max Filippov<jcmvbkbc@gmail.com>
> Date:   Tue Sep 6 03:55:28 2011 +0400
>
>      target-xtensa: implement narrow instructions
>
>      Instructions with op0>= 8 are 2 bytes long, others are 3 bytes long.
>
>      Signed-off-by: Max Filippov<jcmvbkbc@gmail.com>
>      Signed-off-by: Blue Swirl<blauwirbel@gmail.com>
>
> Rich.
>