From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:47504) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RbjJ7-00008N-OB for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 16 Dec 2011 20:43:26 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RbjJ6-0007qT-T4 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 16 Dec 2011 20:43:25 -0500 Received: from mail-gx0-f173.google.com ([209.85.161.173]:45114) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RbjJ6-0007qP-Nc for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 16 Dec 2011 20:43:24 -0500 Received: by ggnk1 with SMTP id k1so3636458ggn.4 for ; Fri, 16 Dec 2011 17:43:24 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <4EEBF3B9.6070301@codemonkey.ws> Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2011 19:43:21 -0600 From: Anthony Liguori MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20110930131148.GA4294@amd.home.annexia.org> <20110930165152.GB4294@amd.home.annexia.org> <20111216221956.GA23695@amd.home.annexia.org> <20111217000704.GB23695@amd.home.annexia.org> In-Reply-To: <20111217000704.GB23695@amd.home.annexia.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] insmod virtio-blk is broken in qemu 1.0 (was: Re: git-bisect results List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: "Richard W.M. Jones" Cc: Amit Shah , Max Filippov , Rusty Russell , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Gerd Hoffmann On 12/16/2011 06:07 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > git bisect says this. I didn't believe it first time, so I ran it > twice with a few modifications, and it pointed to the same commit both > times ... > > 67882fd177389527510eb36b3f7712011a835545 is the first bad commit > commit 67882fd177389527510eb36b3f7712011a835545 > Author: Max Filippov > Date: Tue Sep 6 03:55:28 2011 +0400 > > target-xtensa: implement narrow instructions > > Instructions with op0>= 8 are 2 bytes long, others are 3 bytes long. > > Signed-off-by: Max Filippov > Signed-off-by: Blue Swirl > > Rich. If you disable virtio-serial on the QEMU command line, does the guest boot successfully? I believe this is a guest kernel regression in virtio-serial. Regards, Anthony Liguori >