From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:41060) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RchBa-0002Xn-Fa for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 19 Dec 2011 12:39:43 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RchBT-0003j0-9l for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 19 Dec 2011 12:39:38 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:54298) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RchBT-0003ip-12 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 19 Dec 2011 12:39:31 -0500 Message-ID: <4EEF76CD.1040202@redhat.com> Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2011 19:39:25 +0200 From: Avi Kivity MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <4EEF70B4.3070109@us.ibm.com> In-Reply-To: <4EEF70B4.3070109@us.ibm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [ANNOUNCE] qemu-test: a set of tests scripts for QEMU List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Anthony Liguori Cc: "lmr@redhat.com" , Dor Laor , Gerd Hoffmann , qemu-devel , Stefan Hajnoczi On 12/19/2011 07:13 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote: > Hi, > > I've published a set of tests I wrote over the weekend on qemu.org. > My motivations were 1) to prevent regressions like the libguestfs one > and 2) to have an easier way to do development testing as I work on > QEMU Object Model. > > Now before sending the obligatory, "What about using KVM autotest" > reply, note that this is significantly different than KVM autotest and > really occupies a different use-case. > The consensus of that future thread is that kvm-autotest needs to be able to driver qemu-test, with longer repeat counts where appropriate. This is similar to kvm-unit-tests btw, that too is a standalone project, with some glue magic in kvm-autotest. And they lived happily ever after. -- error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function