From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:43022) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RclEr-0007Et-33 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 19 Dec 2011 16:59:17 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RclEq-0001vN-8H for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 19 Dec 2011 16:59:17 -0500 Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de ([212.227.17.8]:52289) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RclB6-0001Nv-9x for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 19 Dec 2011 16:55:24 -0500 Message-ID: <4EEFB2D2.5000900@rdsoftware.de> Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2011 22:55:30 +0100 From: Erik Rull MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <4EEFAD8E.8050509@rdsoftware.de> <4EEFB11E.10901@codemonkey.ws> In-Reply-To: <4EEFB11E.10901@codemonkey.ws> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] bad USB tablet update rate on qemu-1.0 List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Anthony Liguori Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Gerd Hoffmann Anthony Liguori wrote: > On 12/19/2011 03:33 PM, Erik Rull wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> coming from qemu 0.14 the usbdevice tablet update rate gets really bad in >> qemu-1.0 with the same guest. > > What's the specific guest? > > Regards, > > Anthony Liguori > It's a Windows XP guest. It was fine in 0.14 Thanks. Best regards, Erik