From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:37954) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Rd6Oa-0002PV-Vt for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 20 Dec 2011 15:34:45 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Rd6OZ-0006sS-Q4 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 20 Dec 2011 15:34:44 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:61280) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Rd6OZ-0006s5-JP for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 20 Dec 2011 15:34:43 -0500 Message-ID: <4EF0F15F.4020104@redhat.com> Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2011 18:34:39 -0200 From: Lucas Meneghel Rodrigues MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <4EEF70B4.3070109@us.ibm.com> <4EEF76CD.1040202@redhat.com> <4EEF7A9E.4090307@us.ibm.com> In-Reply-To: <4EEF7A9E.4090307@us.ibm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [ANNOUNCE] qemu-test: a set of tests scripts for QEMU List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Anthony Liguori Cc: Dor Laor , Gerd Hoffmann , Avi Kivity , Stefan Hajnoczi , qemu-devel On 12/19/2011 03:55 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote: > On 12/19/2011 11:39 AM, Avi Kivity wrote: >> On 12/19/2011 07:13 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> I've published a set of tests I wrote over the weekend on qemu.org. >>> My motivations were 1) to prevent regressions like the libguestfs one >>> and 2) to have an easier way to do development testing as I work on >>> QEMU Object Model. >>> >>> Now before sending the obligatory, "What about using KVM autotest" >>> reply, note that this is significantly different than KVM autotest and >>> really occupies a different use-case. >>> >> >> The consensus of that future thread is that kvm-autotest needs to be >> able to driver qemu-test, with longer repeat counts where appropriate. > > Ack. I'm happy to help make the driver work too. > > Regards, > > Anthony Liguori > >> >> This is similar to kvm-unit-tests btw, that too is a standalone project, >> with some glue magic in kvm-autotest. And they lived happily ever after. I'm happy to see we already wrapped up the discussion. I'll gladly review the set of tests and make sure autotest can drive it. Once that is done, we'll execute the latest suite against the latest master branch daily.