From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:53761)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <anthony@codemonkey.ws>) id 1RdmCu-00030u-KK
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 22 Dec 2011 12:13:29 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <anthony@codemonkey.ws>) id 1RdmCp-0004O6-3V
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 22 Dec 2011 12:13:28 -0500
Received: from mail-iy0-f173.google.com ([209.85.210.173]:35703)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <anthony@codemonkey.ws>) id 1RdmCo-0004O0-Sk
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 22 Dec 2011 12:13:23 -0500
Received: by iagj37 with SMTP id j37so15641766iag.4
	for <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>; Thu, 22 Dec 2011 09:13:21 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <4EF3652B.8080300@codemonkey.ws>
Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2011 11:13:15 -0600
From: Anthony Liguori <anthony@codemonkey.ws>
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20111029184502.GH11038@in.ibm.com>	<7816C401-9BE5-48A9-8BA9-4CDAD1B39FC8@suse.de>	<20111108173304.GA14486@sequoia.sous-sol.org>	<20111121150054.GA3602@in.ibm.com>
	<1321889126.28118.5.camel@twins>	<20111121160001.GB3602@in.ibm.com>	<1321894980.28118.16.camel@twins>
	<4ECB0019.7020800@codemonkey.ws>	<20111123150300.GH8397@redhat.com>
	<1322761231.4699.48.camel@twins> <20111222110108.GA7893@amt.cnet>
In-Reply-To: <20111222110108.GA7893@amt.cnet>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH] Exporting Guest RAM information for
 NUMA binding
List-Id: <qemu-devel.nongnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/options/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>, Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>, kvm list <kvm@vger.kernel.org>, bharata@linux.vnet.ibm.com, Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>, qemu-devel Developers <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>, Chris Wright <chrisw@sous-sol.org>, dipankar@in.ibm.com, Vaidyanathan S <svaidy@in.ibm.com>

On 12/22/2011 05:01 AM, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 01, 2011 at 06:40:31PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>> No virt is crap, it needs to die, its horrid, and any solution aimed
>> squarely at virt only is shit and not worth considering, that simple.
>
> Removing this phrase from context (feel free to object on that basis
> to the following inquiry), what are your concerns with virtualization
> itself? Is it the fact that having an unknownable operating system under
> your feet uncomfortable only, or is there something else? Because virt
> is green, it saves silicon.

Oh man, if you say virt solves global warming, I think I'm going to have to jump 
off a bridge to end the madness...

Regards,

Anthony Liguori

>
>