From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:47089) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RgOIa-0004hi-Fs for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 29 Dec 2011 17:18:09 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RgOIZ-0003Pu-JH for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 29 Dec 2011 17:18:08 -0500 Received: from usrksweb02.endace.com ([174.143.168.194]:35226) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RgOIZ-0003Po-C4 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 29 Dec 2011 17:18:07 -0500 Message-ID: <4EFCE702.3040209@endace.com> Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2011 11:17:38 +1300 From: Alexey Korolev MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <4EFA9DF0.7050902@endace.com> <20111228114329.GC26310@redhat.com> <20111229162129.GG2300@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20111229162129.GG2300@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [Seabios] [PATCH 0/3] 64bit PCI BARs allocations List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" Cc: Stephen Donnelly , "yamahata@valinux.co.jp" , "seabios@seabios.org" , "qemu-devel@nongnu.org" On 30/12/11 05:21, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > On Thu, Dec 29, 2011 at 09:20:00AM +0000, Alexey Korolev wrote: >>> Patches have been tested on several configurations which includes >>>> linux 2.6.18 - 3.0& >>>> windows 2008. Everything works quite well. >>> Which qemu version did you use? >> I tried both 0.15 and 1.0 > qemu or qemu-kcm? qemu-kvm