From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:47742) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RjDgK-0006hu-RS for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 06 Jan 2012 12:34:21 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RjDgG-0008Rr-QY for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 06 Jan 2012 12:34:20 -0500 Received: from smtp141.dfw.emailsrvr.com ([67.192.241.141]:51732) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RjDgG-0008Rk-NU for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 06 Jan 2012 12:34:16 -0500 Message-ID: <4F073097.8070002@calxeda.com> Date: Fri, 06 Jan 2012 11:34:15 -0600 From: Mark Langsdorf MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1325793761-10249-1-git-send-email-mark.langsdorf@calxeda.com> <1325793761-10249-6-git-send-email-mark.langsdorf@calxeda.com> <4F072849.3080908@calxeda.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 5/5] arm: SoC model for Calxeda Highbank List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Peter Maydell Cc: "qemu-devel@nongnu.org" , Rob Herring , "afaerber@suse.de" On 01/06/2012 11:04 AM, Peter Maydell wrote: > On 6 January 2012 16:58, Mark Langsdorf wrote: >> On 01/06/2012 10:29 AM, Peter Maydell wrote: >>>> + sysram = g_new(MemoryRegion, 1); >>>> + memory_region_init_ram(sysram, "highbank.sysram", 0x8000); >>>> + memory_region_add_subregion(sysmem, 0xfff88000, sysram); >>>> + if (load_image_targphys("sysram.bin", 0xfff88000, 0x8000) < 0) { >>>> + fprintf(stderr, "Unable to load sysram.bin\n"); >>>> + } >>> >>> Is this for some sort of BIOS-image equivalent? >> >> Yes, uboot and the like. It isn't necessary to boot the system, >> but it models the actual board a bit better. > > If it's not necessary, should we be failing if there isn't an image file > present? Are we failing? We're printing out a warning message, but the boot goes on. --Mark Langsdorf Calxeda, Inc.