From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:56956) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RkHHD-0005zQ-5J for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 09 Jan 2012 10:36:50 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RkHHC-0005fQ-AT for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 09 Jan 2012 10:36:47 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:40202) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RkHHC-0005f8-0M for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 09 Jan 2012 10:36:46 -0500 Message-ID: <4F0B0980.50306@redhat.com> Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2012 17:36:32 +0200 From: Avi Kivity MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1323467645-24271-1-git-send-email-anthony.perard@citrix.com> <4EE617BA.4030102@siemens.com> <4EEE25DA.2080400@redhat.com> <4F048B10.1060505@redhat.com> <4F059C8C.2030303@redhat.com> <4F05A684.7000509@redhat.com> <4F05BF9E.7000203@redhat.com> <4F05D0BC.70707@redhat.com> <4F05E301.2020808@redhat.com> <4F05F09E.8030800@web.de> <4F06F76F.7090002@web.de> <4F097253.5080600@redhat.com> <4F0B0782.4090606@siemens.com> In-Reply-To: <4F0B0782.4090606@siemens.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH V2 5/5] vga-cirrus: Workaround during restore when using Xen. List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Jan Kiszka Cc: Anthony Perard , Xen Devel , QEMU-devel , Stefano Stabellini On 01/09/2012 05:28 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote: > On 2012-01-09 16:25, Stefano Stabellini wrote: > > On Sun, 8 Jan 2012, Avi Kivity wrote: > >> On 01/06/2012 04:40 PM, Stefano Stabellini wrote: > >>> Avi, if you think that early_savevm is a decent solution, we'll start > >>> working on it. > >> > >> I don't like early_savevm because it complicates life for devices, for > >> what is a localized problem. But if everything else is even more > >> complicated maybe we should do it. > > > > I have been thinking more about this issue but unfortunately I cannot > > come up with anything better than early_savevm. > > And I do not yet see the impact of the early_savevm concept on devices. > Its point is to have some vmstate that is unrelated, actually predates > any device creation (during restore). Okay then, at least we tried. -- error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function