From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:55492)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <avi@redhat.com>) id 1RkHux-000322-Dr
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 09 Jan 2012 11:17:57 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <avi@redhat.com>) id 1RkHur-0004jj-JW
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 09 Jan 2012 11:17:51 -0500
Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:23583)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <avi@redhat.com>) id 1RkHur-0004jc-5m
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 09 Jan 2012 11:17:45 -0500
Message-ID: <4F0B12F5.3060109@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2012 18:16:53 +0200
From: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <1326124572-8312-1-git-send-email-aliguori@us.ibm.com>
	<4F0B1016.2010600@us.ibm.com>
In-Reply-To: <4F0B1016.2010600@us.ibm.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Please read: make check framework
List-Id: <qemu-devel.nongnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/options/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Anthony Liguori <aliguori@us.ibm.com>
Cc: Mark McLoughlin <markmc@redhat.com>, "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>, Blue Swirl <blauwirbel@gmail.com>, Max Filippov <jcmvbkbc@gmail.com>, Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@redhat.com>, "Edgar E. Iglesias" <edgar.iglesias@gmail.com>, Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>, Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>, =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Andreas_F=E4rber?= <andreas.faerber@web.de>, =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Herv=E9_Poussineau?= <hpoussin@reactos.org>, Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@linux.vnet.ibm.com>, Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com>, Stefan Weil <sw@weilnetz.de>, Riku Voipio <riku.voipio@iki.fi>, Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@web.de>, Paul Brook <paul@codesourcery.com>, Daniel Gollub <gollub@b1-systems.de>, Luiz Capitulino <lcapitulino@redhat.com>, "Venkateswararao Jujjuri (JV)" <jvrao@linux.vnet.ibm.com>, Richard Henderson <rth@twiddle.net>, Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>, "Vassili Karpov (malc)" <av1474@comtv.ru>, Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>, Michael Walle <michael@walle.cc>, Amit Shah <amit.shah@redhat.com>, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>, Aurelien Jarno <aurelien@aurel32.net>

On 01/09/2012 06:04 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm going to apply this series quickly and will start running 'make
> check-quick' as part a sniff test before pushing patches.
>
> I'd like to request that all maintainers/submaintainers do the same
> and that everyone contributes unit tests to this target.
>

Good stuff.

> The general rules for 'make check-quick':
>
>  1) It must complete in less than 10 minutes start to finish (the
> entire rule).  We can re-examine this over time but for now, it seems
> like a reasonable limit.
>
>  2) It must gracefully degrade across architectures/targets.  Do not
> assume qemu-system-x86_64 is present or that an arm cross compiler is
> available.
>

There's a cross compiler in Fedora, arm-gp2x-linux-gcc.x86_64.  Is it
suitable for make check?

-- 
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function