From: "Andreas Färber" <andreas.faerber@web.de>
To: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Cc: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>, Chris Wright <chrisw@redhat.com>,
Anthony Liguori <aliguori@us.ibm.com>,
Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@gmail.com>,
Corey Bryant <coreyb@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
qemu-devel <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>, Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>,
Stefan Weil <sw@weilnetz.de>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC] QEMU Code Audit Team
Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2012 17:31:30 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4F0C67E2.5020109@web.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAFEAcA_VUgbKZucNYHX-oOV-q+KxT2q5BgW5Xwczb=1-0wKY2Q@mail.gmail.com>
Am 10.01.2012 16:41, schrieb Peter Maydell:
> On 10 January 2012 13:39, Andreas Färber <andreas.faerber@web.de> wrote:
>> If you want an incentive, just put up a rule that every patch needs to
>> be reviewed by at least the submaintainer and one person apart from the
>> author (i.e., SoB + RB/AB + SoB). If a patch is lacking that additional
>> review, the author will ping the list.
>
> Were you volunteering to do that extra review for everybody?
I have been quite a lot since doing virtualization full-time, haven't I?
I'm not volunteering for the block branch though, that's still dark
magic to me!
> It's hard enough getting one review, let alone two...
Given and take... so back to Kevin's proposal after all. ;)
/-F
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-01-10 16:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-01-06 15:19 [Qemu-devel] [RFC] QEMU Code Audit Team Anthony Liguori
2012-01-06 16:01 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2012-01-06 16:14 ` Stefan Weil
2012-01-06 16:08 ` Corey Bryant
2012-01-06 17:25 ` Chris Wright
2012-01-08 14:01 ` Dor Laor
2012-01-08 16:54 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2012-01-06 17:37 ` Chris Wright
2012-01-06 20:02 ` Andreas Färber
2012-01-06 20:42 ` Anthony Liguori
2012-01-07 3:09 ` Peter Maydell
2012-01-07 10:42 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2012-01-10 12:58 ` Kevin Wolf
2012-01-10 13:22 ` Anthony Liguori
2012-01-10 13:33 ` Kevin Wolf
2012-01-10 13:39 ` Andreas Färber
2012-01-10 14:55 ` Kevin Wolf
2012-01-10 15:41 ` Peter Maydell
2012-01-10 16:31 ` Andreas Färber [this message]
2012-01-10 14:21 ` Anthony Liguori
2012-01-10 3:31 ` Zhi Yong Wu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4F0C67E2.5020109@web.de \
--to=andreas.faerber@web.de \
--cc=aliguori@us.ibm.com \
--cc=avi@redhat.com \
--cc=chrisw@redhat.com \
--cc=coreyb@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=kwolf@redhat.com \
--cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=stefanha@gmail.com \
--cc=stefanha@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=sw@weilnetz.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).