From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:35253) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Rlk6r-0007IK-2M for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 13 Jan 2012 11:36:14 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Rlk6p-0007NR-St for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 13 Jan 2012 11:36:09 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:48667) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Rlk6p-0007NJ-Kt for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 13 Jan 2012 11:36:07 -0500 Message-ID: <4F105D6F.7080001@redhat.com> Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2012 17:35:59 +0100 From: Paolo Bonzini MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1326453552-17189-1-git-send-email-hare@suse.de> <4F10584F.3020107@codemonkey.ws> In-Reply-To: <4F10584F.3020107@codemonkey.ws> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH][v9] megasas: LSI Megaraid SAS HBA emulation List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Anthony Liguori Cc: Alexander Graf , Hannes Reinecke , qemu-devel@nongnu.org On 01/13/2012 05:14 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote: > > Otherwise the code looks reasonably sane. Would like Paolo to take a > look through the SCSI bits though. Yeah, that's pretty much the only thing I looked at. Paolo