From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:34233)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <afaerber@suse.de>) id 1RlokR-0001mt-IX
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 13 Jan 2012 16:33:22 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <afaerber@suse.de>) id 1RlokP-0002zX-18
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 13 Jan 2012 16:33:19 -0500
Received: from cantor2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:56919 helo=mx2.suse.de)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <afaerber@suse.de>) id 1RlokO-0002yU-Rr
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 13 Jan 2012 16:33:16 -0500
Message-ID: <4F10A2B0.5050902@suse.de>
Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2012 22:31:28 +0100
From: =?ISO-8859-15?Q?Andreas_F=E4rber?= <afaerber@suse.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <1324549207-23957-1-git-send-email-sw@weilnetz.de>
	<4F109E77.3030901@weilnetz.de>
In-Reply-To: <4F109E77.3030901@weilnetz.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2] w32: Build windows and console
	executables
List-Id: <qemu-devel.nongnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/options/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Stefan Weil <sw@weilnetz.de>
Cc: blauwirbel@gmail.com, Anthony Liguori <aliguori@us.ibm.com>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org

Am 13.01.2012 22:13, schrieb Stefan Weil:
> Am 22.12.2011 11:20, schrieb Stefan Weil:
>> System emulation executables with SDL are typically windows
>> executables. Sometimes console executables are more useful,
>> so create both variants if linker option -mwindows was detected.
>>
>> v2:
>> This version uses QEMU_PROGW / QEMU_PROG instead of QEMU_PROG /
>> QEMU_PROGC.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Stefan Weil<sw@weilnetz.de>
>> ---
>>   Makefile.target |   16 +++++++++++++++-
>>   1 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)

> Ping? All open questions were solved, so this patch can be committed.

No objection to this patch, just raising the question whether we might
want to compile code differently for the two targets? For example, does
-nographic make sense for the *w.exe?

Andreas

--=20
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 N=FCrnberg, Germany
GF: Jeff Hawn, Jennifer Guild, Felix Imend=F6rffer; HRB 16746 AG N=FCrnbe=
rg