From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:41135) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RmsIw-0001E8-Kw for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 16 Jan 2012 14:33:22 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RmsIv-0006bi-EQ for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 16 Jan 2012 14:33:18 -0500 Received: from mail-gx0-f173.google.com ([209.85.161.173]:41050) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RmsIv-0006bc-7u for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 16 Jan 2012 14:33:17 -0500 Received: by ggnk1 with SMTP id k1so3503700ggn.4 for ; Mon, 16 Jan 2012 11:33:16 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <4F147B78.4090706@codemonkey.ws> Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2012 13:33:12 -0600 From: Anthony Liguori MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1326066759-8210-1-git-send-email-agraf@suse.de> In-Reply-To: <1326066759-8210-1-git-send-email-agraf@suse.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/2] KVM: Add new -cpu best List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Alexander Graf Cc: "qemu-devel@nongnu.org Developers" , kvm list , Avi Kivity On 01/08/2012 05:52 PM, Alexander Graf wrote: > During discussions on whether to make -cpu host the default in SLE, I found > myself disagreeing to the thought, because it potentially opens a big can > of worms for potential bugs. But if I already am so opposed to it for SLE, how > can it possibly be reasonable to default to -cpu host in upstream QEMU? And > what would a sane default look like? What are the arguments against -cpu host? Regards, Anthony Liguori