From: Michael Roth <mdroth@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Luiz Capitulino <lcapitulino@redhat.com>
Cc: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>, jcody@redhat.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/2] qemu-ga: Add the guest-suspend command
Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2012 14:02:08 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4F148240.6070900@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120116152352.3f97d12e@doriath>
On 01/16/2012 11:23 AM, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
> On Mon, 16 Jan 2012 15:18:37 -0200
> Luiz Capitulino<lcapitulino@redhat.com> wrote:
>
>> On Mon, 16 Jan 2012 17:13:39 +0000
>> "Daniel P. Berrange"<berrange@redhat.com> wrote:
>>
>>> On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 03:08:53PM -0200, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
>>>> On Fri, 13 Jan 2012 14:48:04 -0700
>>>> Eric Blake<eblake@redhat.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> + pid = fork();
>>>>>> + if (!pid) {
>>>>>> + char buf[32];
>>>>>> + FILE *sysfile;
>>>>>> + const char *arg;
>>>>>> + const char *pmutils_bin = "pm-is-supported";
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> + if (strcmp(mode, "hibernate") == 0) {
>>>>>
>>>>> Strangely enough, POSIX doesn't include strcmp() in its list of
>>>>> async-signal-safe functions (which is what you should be restricting
>>>>> yourself to, if qemu-ga is multi-threaded), but in practice, I think
>>>>> that is a bug of omission in POSIX, and not something you have to change
>>>>> in your code.
>>>>
>>>> memset() ins't either... sigaction() either, which begins to get
>>>> annoying.
>>>>
>>>> For those familiar with glib: isn't it possible to confirm it's using
>>>> threads and/or acquire a global mutex or something?
>
> Misread, sigaction() is there. The ones that aren't are strcmp(), strstr()
> and memset(). Interestingly, they are all "string functions".
>
There seem to be things beyond that list required to be implemented as
thread/signal safe:
http://www.unix.org/whitepapers/reentrant.html
fread()/fwrite()/f* for instance, more at `man flockfile`:
The stdio functions are thread-safe.
This is achieved by assigning to each
FILE object a lockcount and (if the
lockcount is nonzero) an owning
thread. For each library call, these
functions wait until the FILE object
is no longer locked by a different
thread, then lock it, do the requested
I/O, and unlock the object again.
glib seems to give itself at least some liberty in confirming whether a
function beyond the POSIX-confirmed ones are thread safe.
glib/gthreadpool.c:169 calls g_get_current_time(), for instance, which
calls gettimeofday(), which isn't on the list (but does happen to be
thread-safe). This technically renders a substantial number of functions
glib exposes in it's APIs unsafe, since a large number of those also use
g_get_current_time()/gettimeofday() and don't do any thread
synchronization. The situation seems to be even more lax on win32
(memcpy, memmove, strcmp in their GIO reader thread, for instance), but
I'm not sure what the story is there WRT to thread safety.
qemu as well, we use memcpy/memmove/memset/fread/printf/etc even though
it has the same glib dependencies as qemu-ga, and I don't think it's
realistic to consider removing them.
In practice, are these functions really a problem for multi-threaded
applications (beyond concurrent access to shared storage)? Maybe it
would be sufficient to just check the glibc sources?
>
>>>
>>> The most that GLib says is
>>>
>>> "The GLib threading system used to be initialized with g_thread_init().
>>> This is no longer necessary. Since version 2.32, the GLib threading
>>> system is automatically initialized at the start of your program,
>>> and all thread-creation functions and synchronization primitives
>>> are available right away.
>>>
>>> Note that it is not safe to assume that your program has no threads
>>> even if you don't call g_thread_new() yourself. GLib and GIO can
>>> and will create threads for their own purposes in some cases, such
>>> as when using g_unix_signal_source_new() or when using GDBus. "
>>>
>>> The latter paragraph is rather fuzzy, which is probably intentional.
>>> So I think the only safe thing, in order to be future proof wrt later
>>> GLib releases, is to just assume you have threads at all times.
>>
>> Yeah, and we do use GIO in qemu-ga...
>>
>> Thanks Daniel.
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Daniel
>>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-01-16 20:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-01-13 19:15 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v5 0/2]: qemu-ga: Add the guest-suspend command Luiz Capitulino
2012-01-13 19:15 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/2] qemu-ga: set O_NONBLOCK for serial channels Luiz Capitulino
2012-01-13 19:15 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/2] qemu-ga: Add the guest-suspend command Luiz Capitulino
2012-01-13 21:48 ` Eric Blake
2012-01-16 10:51 ` Jamie Lokier
2012-01-16 15:59 ` Eric Blake
2012-01-17 10:57 ` Jamie Lokier
2012-01-18 19:13 ` Eric Blake
2012-01-16 15:46 ` Luiz Capitulino
2012-01-16 17:08 ` Luiz Capitulino
2012-01-16 17:13 ` Daniel P. Berrange
2012-01-16 17:18 ` Luiz Capitulino
2012-01-16 17:23 ` Luiz Capitulino
2012-01-16 20:02 ` Michael Roth [this message]
2012-01-16 20:35 ` Daniel P. Berrange
2012-01-16 22:06 ` Michael Roth
2012-01-17 11:05 ` Jamie Lokier
2012-01-16 20:08 ` Eric Blake
2012-01-16 20:19 ` Luiz Capitulino
2012-01-16 21:10 ` Eric Blake
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2012-01-17 13:27 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v7 0/2]: " Luiz Capitulino
2012-01-17 13:27 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/2] " Luiz Capitulino
2012-01-16 20:09 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v6 0/2]: " Luiz Capitulino
2012-01-16 20:09 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/2] " Luiz Capitulino
2012-01-16 21:06 ` Daniel P. Berrange
2012-01-17 12:18 ` Luiz Capitulino
2012-01-17 12:27 ` Daniel P. Berrange
2012-01-16 22:17 ` Michael Roth
2012-01-17 12:22 ` Luiz Capitulino
2012-01-04 19:45 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v4 0/2]: " Luiz Capitulino
2012-01-04 19:45 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/2] " Luiz Capitulino
2012-01-04 20:00 ` Michael Roth
2012-01-04 20:03 ` Eric Blake
2012-01-05 12:29 ` Luiz Capitulino
2012-01-05 12:46 ` Daniel P. Berrange
2012-01-05 12:58 ` Luiz Capitulino
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4F148240.6070900@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=mdroth@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=eblake@redhat.com \
--cc=jcody@redhat.com \
--cc=lcapitulino@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).