From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:42297) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Rn6VC-0004e2-Kw for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 17 Jan 2012 05:42:58 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Rn6V6-0004XJ-Sx for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 17 Jan 2012 05:42:54 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:63096) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Rn6V6-0004WS-MP for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 17 Jan 2012 05:42:48 -0500 Message-ID: <4F15509C.8020105@redhat.com> Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2012 11:42:36 +0100 From: Paolo Bonzini MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1326479558-3016-1-git-send-email-aliguori@us.ibm.com> <1326479558-3016-4-git-send-email-aliguori@us.ibm.com> <4F14691D.1020201@codemonkey.ws> In-Reply-To: <4F14691D.1020201@codemonkey.ws> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 4/6] make: add check targets based on gtester List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Anthony Liguori Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org On 01/16/2012 07:14 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote: >> >> Looks like there isn't any documentation about the protocol that >> gtester uses, >> and no Python implementation of the same in any other language. Or >> dually, no >> support for TAP output in gtester. :/ >> >> I would have expected a bit less NIH from glib, but oh well... > > Yes, I had a similar reaction. > > But it's good enough for our purposes and only depends on our mandatory > dependencies. Agreed. I'm looking into writing a gtest runner for pyunit. Paolo