From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:36265) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RndLE-0002zs-PT for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 18 Jan 2012 16:46:49 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RndLD-0002CH-H9 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 18 Jan 2012 16:46:48 -0500 Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de ([212.227.17.8]:63013) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RndLB-0002C9-LM for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 18 Jan 2012 16:46:47 -0500 Message-ID: <4F173DC3.5020604@rdsoftware.de> Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2012 22:46:43 +0100 From: Erik Rull MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <4EEFAD8E.8050509@rdsoftware.de> <4EEFB11E.10901@codemonkey.ws> <4EEFB2D2.5000900@rdsoftware.de> <4F04DE0A.5050005@rdsoftware.de> In-Reply-To: <4F04DE0A.5050005@rdsoftware.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] bad USB tablet update rate on qemu-1.0 List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org Cc: Gerd Hoffmann Erik Rull wrote: > Erik Rull wrote: >> Anthony Liguori wrote: >>> On 12/19/2011 03:33 PM, Erik Rull wrote: >>>> Hi all, >>>> >>>> coming from qemu 0.14 the usbdevice tablet update rate gets really bad in >>>> qemu-1.0 with the same guest. >>> >>> What's the specific guest? >>> >>> Regards, >>> >>> Anthony Liguori >>> >> >> It's a Windows XP guest. It was fine in 0.14 >> >> Thanks. >> >> Best regards, >> >> Erik >> > > Any progress here? I tested it on another CPU board there it was worse - > only 1-2 cursor updates per second :-( > I tried to use the wacom-tablet but didn't find a driver that works. > > Best regards, > > Erik > Hi all, today I tested some stuff with VNC for remote access of the VM - there the update rate of the USB tablet (mouse cursor) was really great. So the question is now: - Same host operating system for 0.14 and 1.0 - Same command line parameters beside the vnc option Why is the native mouse on the qemu 0.14 system good for both vnc and native and on the qemu 1.0 system only good for vnc and bad for the native hardware mouse? Maybe this helps finding the source of evil... If you have ideas what to change / patches to test, just let me know. Best regards, Erik