From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:38653) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Rnv2I-00049w-4i for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 19 Jan 2012 11:40:27 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Rnv2B-0000yM-KM for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 19 Jan 2012 11:40:26 -0500 Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de ([212.227.126.171]:54310) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Rnv2B-0000y5-CB for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 19 Jan 2012 11:40:19 -0500 Message-ID: <4F184773.1000405@rdsoftware.de> Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2012 17:40:19 +0100 From: Erik Rull MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <4EEFAD8E.8050509@rdsoftware.de> <4EEFB11E.10901@codemonkey.ws> <4EEFB2D2.5000900@rdsoftware.de> <4F04DE0A.5050005@rdsoftware.de> <4F173DC3.5020604@rdsoftware.de> In-Reply-To: <4F173DC3.5020604@rdsoftware.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] bad USB tablet update rate on qemu-1.0 List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org Cc: Gerd Hoffmann Erik Rull wrote: > Erik Rull wrote: >> Erik Rull wrote: >>> Anthony Liguori wrote: >>>> On 12/19/2011 03:33 PM, Erik Rull wrote: >>>>> Hi all, >>>>> >>>>> coming from qemu 0.14 the usbdevice tablet update rate gets really bad in >>>>> qemu-1.0 with the same guest. >>>> >>>> What's the specific guest? >>>> >>>> Regards, >>>> >>>> Anthony Liguori >>>> >>> >>> It's a Windows XP guest. It was fine in 0.14 >>> >>> Thanks. >>> >>> Best regards, >>> >>> Erik >>> >> >> Any progress here? I tested it on another CPU board there it was worse - >> only 1-2 cursor updates per second :-( >> I tried to use the wacom-tablet but didn't find a driver that works. >> >> Best regards, >> >> Erik >> > > Hi all, > > today I tested some stuff with VNC for remote access of the VM - there the > update rate of the USB tablet (mouse cursor) was really great. So the > question is now: > - Same host operating system for 0.14 and 1.0 > - Same command line parameters beside the vnc option > Why is the native mouse on the qemu 0.14 system good for both vnc and > native and on the qemu 1.0 system only good for vnc and bad for the native > hardware mouse? > > Maybe this helps finding the source of evil... > If you have ideas what to change / patches to test, just let me know. > > Best regards, > > Erik > Hi all, I additionally tested -std vga to exclude that it might be related to the cirrus emulation - but same result. So there seems to be a difference between the captured cursor for the native X-Windows window and the VNC window that occured somewhere between 0.14 and 1.0. Best regards, Erik