From: "Andreas Färber" <afaerber@suse.de>
To: Erik Rull <erik.rull@rdsoftware.de>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] bad USB tablet update rate on qemu-1.0
Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2012 17:57:16 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4F184B6C.9060004@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4F184773.1000405@rdsoftware.de>
Am 19.01.2012 17:40, schrieb Erik Rull:
> Erik Rull wrote:
>> Erik Rull wrote:
>>> Erik Rull wrote:
>>>> Anthony Liguori wrote:
>>>>> On 12/19/2011 03:33 PM, Erik Rull wrote:
>>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> coming from qemu 0.14 the usbdevice tablet update rate gets really
>>>>>> bad in
>>>>>> qemu-1.0 with the same guest.
>>>>>
>>>>> What's the specific guest?
>>>>>
>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>
>>>>> Anthony Liguori
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> It's a Windows XP guest. It was fine in 0.14
>>>>
>>>> Thanks.
>>>>
>>>> Best regards,
>>>>
>>>> Erik
>>>>
>>>
>>> Any progress here? I tested it on another CPU board there it was worse -
>>> only 1-2 cursor updates per second :-(
>>> I tried to use the wacom-tablet but didn't find a driver that works.
>>>
>>> Best regards,
>>>
>>> Erik
>>>
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> today I tested some stuff with VNC for remote access of the VM - there
>> the
>> update rate of the USB tablet (mouse cursor) was really great. So the
>> question is now:
>> - Same host operating system for 0.14 and 1.0
>> - Same command line parameters beside the vnc option
>> Why is the native mouse on the qemu 0.14 system good for both vnc and
>> native and on the qemu 1.0 system only good for vnc and bad for the
>> native
>> hardware mouse?
>>
>> Maybe this helps finding the source of evil...
>> If you have ideas what to change / patches to test, just let me know.
>>
>> Best regards,
>>
>> Erik
>>
>
> Hi all,
>
> I additionally tested -std vga to exclude that it might be related to
> the cirrus emulation - but same result. So there seems to be a
> difference between the captured cursor for the native X-Windows window
> and the VNC window that occured somewhere between 0.14 and 1.0.
Then try `git bisect start v1.0 v0.14.0' to find out when exactly the
perceived behavior changed. :)
Andreas
--
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
GF: Jeff Hawn, Jennifer Guild, Felix Imendörffer; HRB 16746 AG Nürnberg
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-01-19 16:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-12-19 21:33 [Qemu-devel] bad USB tablet update rate on qemu-1.0 Erik Rull
2011-12-19 21:48 ` Anthony Liguori
2011-12-19 21:55 ` Erik Rull
2012-01-04 23:17 ` Erik Rull
2012-01-18 21:28 ` Erik Rull
2012-01-18 21:46 ` Erik Rull
2012-01-19 16:40 ` Erik Rull
2012-01-19 16:57 ` Andreas Färber [this message]
2012-01-19 19:15 ` Erik Rull
2012-01-20 9:09 ` Andreas Färber
2012-01-20 12:25 ` Erik Rull
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2012-01-23 8:57 erik.rull
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4F184B6C.9060004@suse.de \
--to=afaerber@suse.de \
--cc=erik.rull@rdsoftware.de \
--cc=kraxel@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).