From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:47418) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RpeJN-0004Vl-Q2 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 24 Jan 2012 06:13:14 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RpeJJ-0000Vw-Fy for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 24 Jan 2012 06:13:13 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:34710) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RpeJJ-0000Vr-6Y for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 24 Jan 2012 06:13:09 -0500 Message-ID: <4F1E923D.2090208@redhat.com> Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2012 13:13:01 +0200 From: Avi Kivity MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <4F19AB66.8060901@siemens.com> <4F1D4974.4090003@siemens.com> <4F1D4E43.7000501@siemens.com> <4F1D80BA.1040504@siemens.com> <4F1D9546.4040801@siemens.com> <4F1D9649.1000102@codemonkey.ws> <4F1D995A.4020604@siemens.com> <4F1D9A8E.1080102@codemonkey.ws> <4F1E8635.2020608@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <4F1E8635.2020608@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v4 0/6] save/restore on Xen List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Gerd Hoffmann Cc: Jan Kiszka , "xen-devel@lists.xensource.com" , "qemu-devel@nongnu.org" , Stefano Stabellini On 01/24/2012 12:21 PM, Gerd Hoffmann wrote: > >>> > >>> But viewing RAM as just another device, having Xen only restore a > >>> subset of > >>> devices should be a reasonable thing to do moving forward. > > I don't think modeling device memory (i.e. vga vram) as something > independent from the device (vga) is a good idea. Because it isn't. Right. We should have VMSTATE_RAM() to express the dependency. -- error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function