[Qemu-devel] KVM call agenda for Tuesday 24

[Qemu-devel] KVM call agenda for Tuesday 24

[Markus Armbruster]

Please send in any agenda items you are interested in covering.

Cheers,

Markus

Re: [Qemu-devel] KVM call agenda for Tuesday 24

[Anthony Liguori]

On 01/23/2012 11:38 AM, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> Please send in any agenda items you are interested in covering.

I don't have anything pressing.  I vote to cancel the call.

Regards,

Anthony Liguori

>
> Cheers,
>
> Markus
>

Re: [Qemu-devel] KVM call agenda for Tuesday 24

[Paolo Bonzini]

On 01/24/2012 02:57 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
>> Please send in any agenda items you are interested in covering.
>
> I don't have anything pressing.  I vote to cancel the call.

Nothing that cannot be discussed by email, but anyway here are a couple 
of topics:

* qtest/libos: Python or C?

* QOM merge: what about a "new device freeze" for 1.1 around mid February?

Paolo

Re: [Qemu-devel] KVM call agenda for Tuesday 24

[Anthony Liguori]

On 01/24/2012 08:03 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> On 01/24/2012 02:57 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
>>> Please send in any agenda items you are interested in covering.
>>
>> I don't have anything pressing. I vote to cancel the call.
>
> Nothing that cannot be discussed by email, but anyway here are a couple of topics:

Ok.

>
> * qtest/libos: Python or C?

Both.

> * QOM merge: what about a "new device freeze" for 1.1 around mid February?

I'm not sure it's necessary.  For 2/4, I was blocked on the prep and bamboo 
merges which just got in yesterday, I'm going to rebase right now and send out 
patches.  I think this are ready for merge so if there aren't major comments in 
the next couple days, I'll apply them.

3/4 is very invasive, but should be non-controversial.  There are no 
not-for-merge's like there were for 2/4 so I hope it can be applied quickly.

Regards,

Anthony Liguori

> Paolo
>

Re: [Qemu-devel] KVM call agenda for Tuesday 24

[Kevin Wolf]

Am 24.01.2012 15:08, schrieb Anthony Liguori:
> On 01/24/2012 08:03 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>> On 01/24/2012 02:57 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
>>>> Please send in any agenda items you are interested in covering.
>>>
>>> I don't have anything pressing. I vote to cancel the call.
>>
>> Nothing that cannot be discussed by email, but anyway here are a couple of topics:
> 
> Ok.
> 
>>
>> * qtest/libos: Python or C?
> 
> Both.

More importantly: When? :-)

Are there still any problems that must be fixed before it can be merged?

Kevin

Re: [Qemu-devel] KVM call agenda for Tuesday 24

[Markus Armbruster]

Anthony Liguori <anthony@codemonkey.ws> writes:

> On 01/23/2012 11:38 AM, Markus Armbruster wrote:
>> Please send in any agenda items you are interested in covering.
>
> I don't have anything pressing.  I vote to cancel the call.

Call's cancelled.

Re: [Qemu-devel] KVM call agenda for Tuesday 24

[Paolo Bonzini]

On 01/24/2012 03:30 PM, Kevin Wolf wrote:
>>> >>  * qtest/libos: Python or C?
>> >
>> >  Both.
> More importantly: When?:-)
>
> Are there still any problems that must be fixed before it can be merged?

There was no discussion on my alternative proposal on IRQ interception. 
  Which might mean it's all fine and it will just replace Anthony's 
qtest_interrupt_controller, but I'm not that optimist. :)  Certainly 
Anthony's approach to IRQ interception had some objections from Peter 
(which I second).

Also, Anthony's sleep(1) hack _can_ be eliminated, I didn't have it in 
my Python version.

In that series I also had vm_clock management, but it can go in afterwards.

Similarly, PyUnit integration can be committed separately.  Knowing that 
the answer is "both" is fine.

URLs:
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.emulators.qemu/132558 (IRQ/timer)
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.emulators.qemu/132512 (Python)


Paolo