From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:47242)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <paolo.bonzini@gmail.com>) id 1Rphkp-0006qr-Mh
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 24 Jan 2012 09:53:56 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <paolo.bonzini@gmail.com>) id 1Rphkf-0003IB-6d
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 24 Jan 2012 09:53:47 -0500
Received: from mail-iy0-f173.google.com ([209.85.210.173]:42319)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <paolo.bonzini@gmail.com>) id 1Rphkf-0003Hr-3P
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 24 Jan 2012 09:53:37 -0500
Received: by iahk25 with SMTP id k25so4694065iah.4
	for <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>; Tue, 24 Jan 2012 06:53:36 -0800 (PST)
Sender: Paolo Bonzini <paolo.bonzini@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <4F1EC5E8.9050600@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2012 15:53:28 +0100
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <m31uqqwc8q.fsf@blackfin.pond.sub.org>	<4F1EB8AF.3080804@codemonkey.ws>
	<4F1EBA35.20902@redhat.com> <4F1EBB7A.8090903@codemonkey.ws>
	<4F1EC099.9080705@redhat.com>
In-Reply-To: <4F1EC099.9080705@redhat.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] KVM call agenda for Tuesday 24
List-Id: <qemu-devel.nongnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/options/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Cc: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>, qemu-devel <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>, "kvm@vger.kernel.org" <kvm@vger.kernel.org>

On 01/24/2012 03:30 PM, Kevin Wolf wrote:
>>> >>  * qtest/libos: Python or C?
>> >
>> >  Both.
> More importantly: When?:-)
>
> Are there still any problems that must be fixed before it can be merged?

There was no discussion on my alternative proposal on IRQ interception. 
  Which might mean it's all fine and it will just replace Anthony's 
qtest_interrupt_controller, but I'm not that optimist. :)  Certainly 
Anthony's approach to IRQ interception had some objections from Peter 
(which I second).

Also, Anthony's sleep(1) hack _can_ be eliminated, I didn't have it in 
my Python version.

In that series I also had vm_clock management, but it can go in afterwards.

Similarly, PyUnit integration can be committed separately.  Knowing that 
the answer is "both" is fine.

URLs:
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.emulators.qemu/132558 (IRQ/timer)
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.emulators.qemu/132512 (Python)


Paolo