From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:38255) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RqOSj-0002F0-Uq for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 26 Jan 2012 07:30:06 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RqOSe-0008Ly-6l for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 26 Jan 2012 07:29:57 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:25162) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RqOSd-0008Lq-UM for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 26 Jan 2012 07:29:52 -0500 Message-ID: <4F21473B.2000703@redhat.com> Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2012 14:29:47 +0200 From: Avi Kivity MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1326637051-23920-1-git-send-email-avi@redhat.com> <4F12E232.5090809@web.de> <4F130667.9050609@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] kvm: flush the dirty log when unregistering a slot List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Gerhard Wiesinger Cc: Marcelo Tosatti , Jan Kiszka , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org On 01/25/2012 10:15 PM, Gerhard Wiesinger wrote: > On Sun, 15 Jan 2012, Avi Kivity wrote: > >> On 01/15/2012 04:40 PM, Gerhard Wiesinger wrote: >>> On Sun, 15 Jan 2012, Jan Kiszka wrote: >>> >>>> On 2012-01-15 15:17, Avi Kivity wrote: >>>>> Otherwise, the dirty log information is lost in the kernel forever. >>>>> >>>>> Fixes opensuse-12.1 boot screen, which changes the vga windows >>>>> rapidly. >>>> >>>> Confirmed, problems solved here. >>> >>> Problem from: >>> http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.emulators.qemu/131853 >>> >>> Confirmed to be fixed, too. Long awaited patch :-) >> >> Sorry, I forgot about that. Please ping me if I do that. >> >>> >>> BTW: There is also a major difference in video performance: >>> 1.) With Patch: 1400MB/s (MByte/s) >>> 2.) Without Patch: 6MB/s >>> >>> Any reason for that? >> >> What are you measuring exactly? > > I'm measuring VGA video performance under DOS with own written test > program. > > What's strange, new findings: Measurement doesn't depend on the patch. > Sometimes it is high sometimes low. I think I have to investigate > further. > > Any ideas? What vga mode are you using? What does the test program do? -- error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function