From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
To: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Cc: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>,
Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>,
qemu-devel <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>,
Luiz Capitulino <lcapitulino@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] qmp: add BLOCK_MEDIUM_EJECT event
Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2012 13:02:53 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4F22926D.10503@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4F2273CF.3050107@redhat.com>
On 01/27/2012 10:52 AM, Kevin Wolf wrote:
>> > Conclusion: eject returned an error, but a few seconds later the tray opened and
>> > the media wasn't purged. What happened here is that, the_guest_
>> > opened the tray. The code in this patch would trigger the event, but
>> > we shouldn't emit it twice if we cover eject& change (ie. special case)
> bdrv_dev_change_media_cb is not called because media cannot be ejected
> with a locked drive. Instead bdrv_dev_eject_request is called which
> doesn't emit an event.
>
> If the guest happens to initiate an eject itself after receiving the
> eject request, it calls bdrv_eject, where we can emit an event.
>
> If we had force=true in the initial eject command, bdrv_close is called,
> which in turn goes through bdrv_dev_change_media_cb where an event is
> emitted.
But we still emit the eject request, and the guest will cause bdrv_eject
to raise the event again.
There can always be a race with the guest setting the locked bit, so
management has to do a query-block anyway after eject or change. That's
why the event is not necessary when the eject is host-initiated.
Paolo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-01-27 12:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-01-24 18:16 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] qmp: add BLOCK_MEDIUM_EJECT event Luiz Capitulino
2012-01-24 20:03 ` Eric Blake
2012-01-25 8:41 ` Kevin Wolf
2012-01-25 12:42 ` Luiz Capitulino
2012-01-25 13:23 ` Kevin Wolf
2012-01-25 13:32 ` Paolo Bonzini
2012-01-25 13:43 ` Kevin Wolf
2012-01-25 13:49 ` Markus Armbruster
2012-01-25 13:42 ` Luiz Capitulino
2012-01-26 17:57 ` Luiz Capitulino
2012-01-27 9:52 ` Kevin Wolf
2012-01-27 12:02 ` Paolo Bonzini [this message]
2012-01-30 15:18 ` Luiz Capitulino
2012-01-30 15:43 ` Kevin Wolf
2012-01-30 15:55 ` Paolo Bonzini
2012-01-31 8:33 ` Kevin Wolf
2012-01-31 9:23 ` Markus Armbruster
2012-01-31 13:46 ` Luiz Capitulino
2012-01-25 10:19 ` Markus Armbruster
2012-01-25 13:31 ` Luiz Capitulino
2012-01-25 14:12 ` Markus Armbruster
2012-01-27 12:10 ` Paolo Bonzini
2012-01-30 15:36 ` Luiz Capitulino
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4F22926D.10503@redhat.com \
--to=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=armbru@redhat.com \
--cc=eblake@redhat.com \
--cc=kwolf@redhat.com \
--cc=lcapitulino@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).