From: "Andreas Färber" <afaerber@suse.de>
To: Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>
Cc: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Rob Herring <rob.herring@calxeda.com>,
Paul Brook <paul@codesourcery.com>,
"Edgar E. Iglesias" <edgar.iglesias@gmail.com>,
Jeremy Kerr <jeremy.kerr@canonical.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] arm: add device tree support
Date: Sun, 29 Jan 2012 19:48:55 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4F259497.6060904@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120129160105.GA10629@ponder.secretlab.ca>
Am 29.01.2012 17:01, schrieb Grant Likely:
> Okay, well at least let's start with this. Here is an updated version of the
> patch that doesn't touch the board code. It makes the -dtb option available
> to all ARM platforms.
>
> Even if dtb is not the primary structure, we absolutely need this option.
Well, the option itself is what has been the most controversial here.
Yours is at least the third attempt, so far we've seen discussed -dtb,
-kern-dtb, -kernel-dtb, -kernel dtb=, etc. Also how to pass around the
data obtained that way - whether as global variable or via struct passed
to machine init or in a few weeks via QOM.
Andreas
--
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
GF: Jeff Hawn, Jennifer Guild, Felix Imendörffer; HRB 16746 AG Nürnberg
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-01-29 18:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-01-27 21:53 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] arm: add device tree support Grant Likely
2012-01-27 22:34 ` Paul Brook
2012-01-28 18:48 ` Grant Likely
2012-01-29 11:15 ` Paul Brook
2012-01-29 16:01 ` Grant Likely
2012-01-29 18:48 ` Andreas Färber [this message]
2012-01-29 21:29 ` Peter Maydell
2012-01-30 13:33 ` Grant Likely
2012-01-29 19:13 ` Peter Maydell
2012-01-29 20:36 ` Grant Likely
2012-01-30 11:36 ` Andreas Färber
2012-01-30 13:31 ` Grant Likely
2012-01-30 0:24 ` John Williams
2012-01-29 20:42 ` Edgar E. Iglesias
2012-01-29 23:54 ` Peter Crosthwaite
2012-01-30 13:40 ` Grant Likely
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2012-01-29 7:48 Peter Crosthwaite
2012-02-22 19:48 Peter Maydell
2012-02-27 17:38 Peter Maydell
2012-02-27 17:41 ` Anthony Liguori
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4F259497.6060904@suse.de \
--to=afaerber@suse.de \
--cc=edgar.iglesias@gmail.com \
--cc=grant.likely@secretlab.ca \
--cc=jeremy.kerr@canonical.com \
--cc=paul@codesourcery.com \
--cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=rob.herring@calxeda.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).