From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:56049)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <afaerber@suse.de>) id 1RrZqI-0004wX-Ou
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 29 Jan 2012 13:51:11 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <afaerber@suse.de>) id 1RrZqH-0005q2-Pm
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 29 Jan 2012 13:51:10 -0500
Received: from cantor2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:36725 helo=mx2.suse.de)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <afaerber@suse.de>) id 1RrZqH-0005pn-Gi
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 29 Jan 2012 13:51:09 -0500
Message-ID: <4F259497.6060904@suse.de>
Date: Sun, 29 Jan 2012 19:48:55 +0100
From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Andreas_F=E4rber?= <afaerber@suse.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <1327701190-24822-1-git-send-email-grant.likely@secretlab.ca>
	<201201272234.02700.paul@codesourcery.com>
	<20120128184837.GG2501@ponder.secretlab.ca>
	<201201291115.43916.paul@codesourcery.com>
	<20120129160105.GA10629@ponder.secretlab.ca>
In-Reply-To: <20120129160105.GA10629@ponder.secretlab.ca>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] arm: add device tree support
List-Id: <qemu-devel.nongnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/options/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>
Cc: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Rob Herring <rob.herring@calxeda.com>, Paul Brook <paul@codesourcery.com>, "Edgar E. Iglesias" <edgar.iglesias@gmail.com>, Jeremy Kerr <jeremy.kerr@canonical.com>

Am 29.01.2012 17:01, schrieb Grant Likely:
> Okay, well at least let's start with this.  Here is an updated version =
of the
> patch that doesn't touch the board code.  It makes the -dtb option avai=
lable
> to all ARM platforms.
>=20
> Even if dtb is not the primary structure, we absolutely need this optio=
n.

Well, the option itself is what has been the most controversial here.
Yours is at least the third attempt, so far we've seen discussed -dtb,
-kern-dtb, -kernel-dtb, -kernel dtb=3D, etc. Also how to pass around the
data obtained that way - whether as global variable or via struct passed
to machine init or in a few weeks via QOM.

Andreas

--=20
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 N=FCrnberg, Germany
GF: Jeff Hawn, Jennifer Guild, Felix Imend=F6rffer; HRB 16746 AG N=FCrnbe=
rg