From: "Andreas Färber" <afaerber@suse.de>
To: Anthony Liguori <anthony@codemonkey.ws>
Cc: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>,
Anthony Liguori <aliguori@us.ibm.com>,
Richard Henderson <rth@twiddle.net>,
Paul Brook <paul@codesourcery.com>,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC 7/7] target-arm: Embed CPUARMState in QOM ARMCPU
Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2012 13:52:40 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4F269298.4010106@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4F25FEEE.5040504@codemonkey.ws>
Am 30.01.2012 03:22, schrieb Anthony Liguori:
> On 01/29/2012 07:25 AM, Andreas Färber wrote:
>> +#define ENV_GET_OBJECT(e) \
>> + (Object *)((void *)(e) - offsetof(ARMCPU, env))
>
> sizeof(CPU) should be sizeof(void *).
Not following... CPU is a struct, so:
sizeof(ARMCPU) > sizeof(CPU) >= sizeof(Object) == 2x sizeof(void *)
The above formula is calculating the address of the ARMCPU object the
CPUState *env pointer belongs to. Maybe I should make it an inline
function for readability, I just followed the QOM naming conventions.
> Presumably it's okay to add 8
> bytes to the beginning of CPUState?
The whole problem with today's CPUState is that CPU_COMMON fields are at
the back or in the middle, with target-specific offset from the pointer.
We can of course add an Object *obj field to the start of each
CPU*State, but rth's (and Peter's?) worry was that adding things to the
front may push fields in a (TCG) hot path out of range for
immediate-offset load/stores. Thus if we just do it in the back for ARM
I don't see a benefit over the above solution. Per target we know the
offset.
Fields in the front of CPUState are usually
memset(env, 0, offsetof(CPUState, breakpoints));
on reset - one issue this series is working towards cleaning up. :) If
we add an Object* to the front we also have to save and restore it on
reset per target.
Again, the idea here is an interim solution to get moving in the right
direction. Things that are target-specific should not be accessed from
generic code but indirected through CPUClass methods, dispatching to
target code (e.g., reset), at some point obsoleting the aliased
cpu_reset() functions with one real function in cpu.c.
If it turns out that the TLB is common code modulo target_ulong or so
then it may be moved from CPU*State to CPU, making common code work with
CPU rather than CPUState. Long-term, today's CPUState would remain
what's needed for TCG and it's AREG0 + offset(CPUState, x) calculations.
Regards,
Andreas
> If so, that would make things much nicer from a QOM perspective.
>
> Regards,
>
> Anthony Liguori
--
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
GF: Jeff Hawn, Jennifer Guild, Felix Imendörffer; HRB 16746 AG Nürnberg
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-01-30 12:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-01-29 13:25 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC 0/7] Introduce QOM CPU and use for target-arm Andreas Färber
2012-01-29 13:25 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/7][RESEND] qom: Introduce object_class_is_abstract() Andreas Färber
2012-01-29 13:25 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC 2/7] qom: Register QOM infrastructure early Andreas Färber
2012-01-29 13:25 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC 3/7] qom: Add QOM support to user emulators Andreas Färber
2012-01-29 13:25 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC 4/7] qom: Introduce CPU class Andreas Färber
2012-01-30 2:14 ` Anthony Liguori
2012-01-30 11:58 ` Andreas Färber
2012-01-31 10:36 ` Andreas Färber
2012-01-29 13:25 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC 5/7] cpu: Introduce cpu_class_foreach() Andreas Färber
2012-01-30 2:16 ` Anthony Liguori
2012-01-30 12:02 ` Andreas Färber
2012-01-29 13:25 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC 6/7] target-arm: Introduce QOM CPU and use for it CPUID lookup Andreas Färber
2012-01-30 2:19 ` Anthony Liguori
2012-01-30 12:11 ` Andreas Färber
2012-01-29 13:25 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC 7/7] target-arm: Embed CPUARMState in QOM ARMCPU Andreas Färber
2012-01-30 2:22 ` Anthony Liguori
2012-01-30 12:52 ` Andreas Färber [this message]
2012-01-30 16:01 ` Andreas Färber
2012-01-29 23:50 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC 8/7] target-arm: Use IoC for CPU init Andreas Färber
2012-01-30 2:23 ` Anthony Liguori
2012-01-29 23:50 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC 9/7] target-arm: Move CPU feature flags to class Andreas Färber
2012-01-30 19:27 ` Andreas Färber
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4F269298.4010106@suse.de \
--to=afaerber@suse.de \
--cc=aliguori@us.ibm.com \
--cc=anthony@codemonkey.ws \
--cc=paul@codesourcery.com \
--cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=rth@twiddle.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).